Menu

2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Below are all the data points for the 2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test, displaying how each tyre performed across all test categories. The spider chart below provides a complete overview of performance, where one hundred percent represents the best performance in each category. The larger the area covered by each tyre's plot, the better its overall performance.
How to read these charts: For each test category, data is presented relative to the best performing tire. The direction indicates whether lower or higher values are better - pay close attention to this when interpreting results.

Performance Overview

This radar chart shows relative performance across all test categories, with 100% representing the best performance in each category. Reference tires may have gaps where data is not available.

Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
Yokohama W drive V905
Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
Hankook Winter i cept evo2
Nokian WR A4
Toyo Snowprox S954
Nankang SV2
Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
Michelin Pilot Alpin 4

Quick Navigation

Dry Performance Overview

Dry Braking (M)

Spread: 3.30 M (7.5%) | Avg: 45.66 M

Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Nankang SV2 with a result of 43.8 M. The difference between best and worst was 7%.
  1. Nankang SV2
    43.8 M
  2. Nokian WR A4
    44.5 M
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    45.4 M
  4. Toyo Snowprox S954
    45.4 M
  5. Yokohama W drive V905
    45.9 M
  6. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    45.9 M
  7. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    46 M
  8. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    46 M
  9. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    46.6 M
  10. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    47.1 M

Dry Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 3.30 Km/H (2.8%) | Avg: 118.35 Km/H

Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: All the tyres in the dry handling test finished less than 3% apart.
  1. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    119.5 Km/H
  2. Nokian WR A4
    119.1 Km/H
  3. Toyo Snowprox S954
    119.1 Km/H
  4. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    119 Km/H
  5. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    118.9 Km/H
  6. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    118.6 Km/H
  7. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    118.1 Km/H
  8. Yokohama W drive V905
    117.6 Km/H
  9. Nankang SV2
    117.4 Km/H
  10. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    116.2 Km/H

Wet Performance Overview

Wet Braking (M)

Spread: 5.00 M (14%) | Avg: 37.56 M

Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 with a result of 35.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.3%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    35.7 M
  2. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    35.8 M
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    35.9 M
  4. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    36.4 M
  5. Yokohama W drive V905
    36.7 M
  6. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    36.7 M
  7. Nokian WR A4
    38.6 M
  8. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    39.5 M
  9. Nankang SV2
    39.6 M
  10. Toyo Snowprox S954
    40.7 M

Wet Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 4.90 Km/H (6.6%) | Avg: 72.13 Km/H

Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Continental WinterContact TS 850 P with a result of 73.8 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 6.6%.
  1. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    73.8 Km/H
  2. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    73.8 Km/H
  3. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    73.7 Km/H
  4. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    73.5 Km/H
  5. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    73.3 Km/H
  6. Yokohama W drive V905
    73.1 Km/H
  7. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    70.8 Km/H
  8. Nokian WR A4
    70.3 Km/H
  9. Nankang SV2
    70.1 Km/H
  10. Toyo Snowprox S954
    68.9 Km/H

Snow Performance Overview

Snow Braking (M)

Spread: 4.20 M (14.1%) | Avg: 31.32 M

Snow braking in meters (Lower is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Hankook Winter i cept evo2 with a result of 29.7 M. The difference between best and worst was 12.4%.
  1. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    29.7 M
  2. Yokohama W drive V905
    30.1 M
  3. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    30.3 M
  4. Nokian WR A4
    30.5 M
  5. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    30.6 M
  6. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    30.8 M
  7. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    31.5 M
  8. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    32 M
  9. Toyo Snowprox S954
    33.8 M
  10. Nankang SV2
    33.9 M

Snow Handling (Km/H)

Spread: 5.30 Km/H (9.4%) | Avg: 54.39 Km/H

Snow handling average speed (Higher is better)

Key Insight: The best performer was Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 with a result of 56.5 Km/H. The difference between best and worst was 9.4%.
  1. Michelin Pilot Alpin 4
    56.5 Km/H
  2. Continental WinterContact TS 850 P
    56 Km/H
  3. Yokohama W drive V905
    55.8 Km/H
  4. Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1
    55.7 Km/H
  5. Hankook Winter i cept evo2
    55.6 Km/H
  6. Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3
    55.4 Km/H
  7. Toyo Snowprox S954
    53.5 Km/H
  8. Nokian WR A4
    52.2 Km/H
  9. Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus
    52 Km/H
  10. Nankang SV2
    51.2 Km/H

Overall Findings

Based on the weighted scoring from all tests, here are the overall results:

Position Tyre Score
Continental WinterContact TS 850 P 0%
2 Goodyear UltraGrip Performance Gen 1 0%
3 Michelin Pilot Alpin 4 0%
4 Hankook Winter i cept evo2 0%
5 Yokohama W drive V905 0%
6 Pirelli Winter Sottozero 3 0%
7 Nokian WR A4 0%
8 Cooper Weather Master SA2 Plus 0%
9 Nankang SV2 0%
10 Toyo Snowprox S954 0%

Discussion

6 comments
  1. Pipa Cacao archived

    I feel an utter disappointment with Nokian WR4!!
    Both the "2017 Sport Auto Winter Tyre Test" & "AMS Performance 18 inch Winter Tyre Test" were right on the spot with the scores.
    The WR4 are horrible on the wet surfaces!! I have a TT Mk3 and driving it on a highway at any levels of rain is utter horror show. I constantly get the feeling that the car is "floating" (aquaplaning). Overtaking anyone on a wet road is like driving on ice. Even on the dry surfaces, the tyres seem to force the car to "wander". You have to constantly make small steering wheel adjustments in order to have the car go straight. At first I thought that this was due to possible road imperfections" but now I know better.

    VERDICT: "Not recommended"
    Since people rarely drive fast & crazy during the winter, I recommend any other tyre. They might be good on dry, however in most places winter is mostly wet and icy than just being outright cold and dry. Get a tyre with good wet & snow stats.

    #3573
  2. 930 Engineering archived

    There's a mistake. This is the Michelin Pilot Alpin PA4, not the Alpin 4. These are two entirely different tyres.

    #3381
    1. TyreReviews 930 Engineering archived

      Thanks for letting me know, I'll get that updated now.

      Edit - we had the PA4 listed all along!

      #3396
  3. J archived

    I have the Toyo in its second (winter)year now (done approx 25k km), and can't really say they're -that- bad in the wet, but they aren't great either. Dry is pretty good.
    In snow I think they lose grip too quickly. A couple of weeks ago we finally had some deep snow and these certainly can't beat Goodyear and Vredestein. The little snow I had when I placed the review was nothing compared to a couple of weeks ago. In deep snow and sludge these tyres are simply disappointing.

    The abysmal result in the wet here, should be for snow (in my opinion). Since I have never felt like I lacked grip in the wet, while I have had that feeling in snow, that I simply couldn't follow others because of understeer.
    (Fwd 205 wide)

    #3222
    1. TyreReviews J archived

      Worth keeping in mind snow performance drops off quite a lot with wear, and after 25k on a set of winters the driven wheel tyres must be getting rather tired! But you are right, they're no match for the best premium tyres available.

      #3223
      1. J TyreReviews archived

        I have swapped them from front to rear. Those which were at the front in 2016-2017 winter, are at the back in this 2017-2018 winter. So the wear should become pretty even now.

        But I see I in my logs ll mad a mistake with the amount of kms.. I thought I had swapped at 202k, but that was a service interval..

        Winter 2016-2017 started at 27-10-2016 at 183k and ended at 193k at 28-2-2017.
        Winter 2017-2018 started at 29-11-2017 at 211.500 and I'm at 218k now.. so 16,500km.
        Also just checked the wear. Wear is 6.4mm left at the front, 6.1 at the rear. Which isn't too bad..

        #3226