Menu

2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
7 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Road VS Trackday Tyres
  3. The Results
  4. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
  5. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
  6. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
  7. Toyo R888 R
  8. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
  10. Continental Sport Contact 5
  11. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
  12. Toyo Proxes Sport
  13. Kumho Ecsta PS91

Test Summary
Wet Braking Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Dry Braking Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Rolling Resistance Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Noise Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Snow Handling Toyo Proxes Sport
How much faster are track day tyres compared to the best road tyres? The German publication Sport Auto have produced the answer by taking seven of the best maximum performance road tyres and three of the best track day tyres, and placing them all through the same testing on a Toyota GT86 (225/40 R18).

Road VS Trackday Tyres

The Toyota GT86 isn't the most powerful of cars, with the 2 litre NA engine producing just 197 bhp. This means the car won't take advantage of the higher grip levels of semi slicks as much as a more powerful heavy car, but the increase in performance was still noticeable.

Dry Handling

Spread: 3.60 Km/H (4.1%)|Avg: 85.46 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    87.10 Km/H
  2. Toyo R888 R
    86.80 Km/H
  3. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    86.70 Km/H
  4. Continental Sport Contact 5
    85.70 Km/H
  5. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    85.60 Km/H
  6. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    85.10 Km/H
  7. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    84.90 Km/H
  8. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
    84.70 Km/H
  9. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    84.50 Km/H
  10. Toyo Proxes Sport
    83.50 Km/H

The Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyre was the fastest semi slick in the dry lapping the handling course with an average speed of 87.1 km/h, an average of 2 km/h faster than the Michelin Pilot Sport 4. 

Dry Braking

Spread: 4.60 M (14%)|Avg: 34.91 M
Dry braking in meters (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Dry braking is a key advantage for track day tyres, which have a softer compound and less tread pattern to increase the tyres contact patch with the road. The Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R proved best in this test, stopping the Toyota in 32.8 meters, where the road Pirelli P Zero took a further 2.4 meters, stopping the car in 35.2 meters. The biggest surprise of the dry braking test wasn't the advantage of the semi slick tyres, but that the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 matched the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, both stopping the car in 34.4 meters, an impressive result for the road bias Michelin.

Wet Handling

Spread: 12.10 Km/H (15.4%)|Avg: 73.83 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4
    78.50 Km/H
  2. Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
    77.50 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
    76.70 Km/H
  4. Continental Sport Contact 5
    76.00 Km/H
  5. Kumho Ecsta PS91
    75.60 Km/H
  6. Pirelli P Zero PZ4
    75.50 Km/H
  7. Toyo Proxes Sport
    73.90 Km/H
  8. Toyo R888 R
    70.80 Km/H
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
    67.40 Km/H
  10. Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
    66.40 Km/H

Wet testing brings the advantage back to the road tyres. All three semi slick tyres finished at the bottom of the wet handling and aquaplaning tests, with the Michelin track day tyre proving to be the most useful in the tests. Still not a tyre we'd want to fit for year round use in the UK.

Wet Braking

Spread: 7.60 M (23.8%)|Avg: 35.21 M
Wet braking in meters (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

The wet braking tests reversed the dry braking tests, with the test winning Toyo Proxes Sport stopping the GT86 in 32 meters from 80 km/h, where the Toyo R888R track day tyre took a further 2.5 meters, stopping in 34.5 meters.

The comfort, noise and rolling resistance tests were again dominated by the road tyres, with the track day tyres giving up noise and comfort for increased steering precision and speed.

The Results

Please note, due to limitations in our database, we've had to group the track day and "normal" tyres together in the overall results. In the magazine they were rated separate, but they did undergo the same tests.

1st

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

225/40 R18
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Total: 43
Dry 9.5
Wet 9.5
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 8
1st

Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R

225/40 R18
Pirelli P Zero Trofeo R
Total: 33.3
Dry 11
Wet 4.3
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 4
Noise 7
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 3
Total: 43.7
Dry 9.1
Wet 8.6
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 8
2nd

Toyo R888 R

225/40 R18
Toyo R888 R
Total: 31.1
Dry 10.6
Wet 5.5
Comfort 2
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 8
Bridgestone Turanza T001 Evo
Total: 43.2
Dry 8.3
Wet 8.9
Comfort 8
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 8
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Total: 36
Dry 9.9
Wet 5.1
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 6
Noise 8
Continental Sport Contact 5
Total: 35.7
Dry 9.1
Wet 8.6
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 7
5th

Pirelli P Zero PZ4

225/40 R18
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
Total: 43.6
Dry 9.2
Wet 7.4
Comfort 9
Rolling Resistance 10
Noise 8
6th

Toyo Proxes Sport

225/40 R18
Toyo Proxes Sport
Total: 41.4
Dry 8.4
Wet 8
Comfort 7
Rolling Resistance 8
Noise 10
7th

Kumho Ecsta PS91

225/40 R18
Kumho Ecsta PS91
Total: 34.7
Dry 8.4
Wet 7.3
Comfort 6
Rolling Resistance 5
Noise 8

Discussion

10 comments
  1. Neil Flippance archived

    Maybe im not reading it right but on each graph how can you tell which tyre is which ? I cannot see any names on the left hand side ?

    #2627
    1. TyreReviews Neil Flippance archived

      Sorry, there was an error with the database. This has now been fixed :)

      #2628
  2. 4cvg archived

    In your listing (& with other tests like the AutoBild one), would you be able to make clear whether the "L" or "S" version of the PZ4 is being tested. (In each case, the picture is of the "L" version, which seems implausible.) I also suggest a quite separate PZ4 review page to avoid confusion with past generation P Zeros.

    #2601
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      It's a good suggestion and something we've been meaning to do, it's just working out the best way of doing so.

      Pirelli haven't done anyone any favours with the P Zero PZ4 naming!

      #2602
  3. 4cvg archived

    Two observations, both wet braking focused:

    First, the T001 has clearly undergone some mid-life modification of some sort (compounding?).

    Second, note that the R888R is slightlybetter than the estimable SC5. It seems to me to be the pick of the track day tyres despite its reported wet handling nervousness (which could probably be ameliorated by some judicious tyre pressure tuning of the handling balance).

    #2529
    1. TyreReviews 4cvg archived

      We suspect the T001 tested is the T001 EVO which has had a significant mid life update and now has wet grip. Just waiting for confirmation, Bridgestone confused the matter by not printing EVO on the sidewall of the new tyre, just the label.

      #2535
      1. 4cvg TyreReviews archived

        yep
        (it was never bad laterally but braking in the wet seemed decidedly weak in most tests)
        now all they have to do is make the tread stabler under lateral load in the dry

        what's your unpacking of the "nervous" wet handling comment on the R888R?

        #2537
  4. Jim1556 archived

    Eh?

    The Cup 2 scored higher than the R888R & the Trofeo R, yet it came 3rd??? Please explain...

    #2503
    1. TyreReviews Jim1556 archived

      An extreme weighting on the dry scoring.

      I'm not sure I agree either, but this is Sport Autos test.

      #2504