Continental IceContact 3 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
The pattern is clear yet nuanced: the Hakkapeliitta 10 delivers dominant, often class-topping grip on ice and very strong performance on snow, whereas the IceContact 3 consistently outperforms on wet and dry asphalt, with shorter braking, quicker handling laps, better aquaplaning resistance, and generally lower noise. The trade-off is between ultimate winter-surface security and everyday drivability on bare or wet pavement.
Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been seven tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 | seven |
While it might look like the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 is better than the Continental IceContact 3 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Best-in-test consistency on wet/dry asphalt: shorter wet braking and quicker wet handling in most tests
- Stronger straight-line aquaplaning resistance (notably +8-10% vs Nokian in multiple sizes)
- Quieter and more comfortable for a studded tyre, with stable, predictable road manners
- Competitive snow results with precise steering and easy control
- Class-leading ice performance: 20-30% better ice braking/traction in repeated tests
- Excellent snow grip and cornering stability; confident, predictable behavior
- High overall test scores and multiple overall wins across years and sizes
- Good driver engagement with responsive turn-in and strong winter-conditions control
Dry Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 stopped the vehicle in 0.22% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Dry Braking: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 scored 22.17% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during five wet braking tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 stopped the vehicle in 3.92% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Wet Braking: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during five wet handling [s] tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 was 1.8% faster around a wet lap than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during one subj. wet handling tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 scored 7.14% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 floated at a 5.88% higher speed than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Straight Aqua: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Snow Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during four snow braking tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 stopped the vehicle in 0.56% less distance than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Snow Braking: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Snow Braking winner was calculated >>
Snow Traction
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one snow traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 0.39% faster than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Snow Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Traction winner was calculated >>
Snow Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during three snow handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 0.35% faster around a lap than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Snow Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Snow Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one subj. snow handling tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scored 10% more points than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Subj. Snow Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Subj. Snow Handling winner was calculated >>
Ice Braking
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during five ice braking tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 stopped the vehicle 18.62% shorter than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Ice Braking: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Braking winner was calculated >>
Ice Traction
Looking at data from five tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during five ice traction tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 accelerated 22.55% faster than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Ice Traction: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Traction winner was calculated >>
Ice Handling [s]
Looking at data from four tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during four ice handling [s] tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was 6.53% faster around a lap than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Ice Handling [s]: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Ice Handling
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one subj. ice handling tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scored 10% more points than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Subj. Ice Handling: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Subj. Ice Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during two subj. comfort tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 scored 27.27% more points than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Subj. Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during two subj. noise tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 scored 14.29% more points than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Subj. Noise: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Subj. Noise winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Continental IceContact 3 was better during three noise tests. On average the Continental IceContact 3 measured 1.8% quieter than the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Best In Noise: Continental IceContact 3
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Price
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one price tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 cost 3.24% less than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Price: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Price winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one rolling resistance tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 had a 0.93% lower rolling resistance than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Fuel Consumption
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 was better during one fuel consumption tests. On average the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 used 1.2% less fuel than the Continental IceContact 3.
Best In Fuel Consumption: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
See how the Fuel Consumption winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Continental IceContact 3 and Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
In total the Continental IceContact 3 has been reviewed 3 times and drivers have given the tyre 76% overall.
The Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 has been reviewed 9 times and drivers have given the tyre 75% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Continental IceContact 3.
Conclusion
For mixed conditions with lots of cleared roads and wet slush, the Continental IceContact 3 is easier to live with. It brakes shorter and handles better on wet/dry asphalt, resists aquaplaning more effectively, rides a touch quieter, and remains predictable. You give up peak ice grip, but gain calmer, more stable behavior day-to-day. Bottom line: pick Nokian for maximum winter bite; pick Continental for balanced, road-focused confidence when conditions vary.
Key Differences
- Ice dominance: Nokian consistently outbrakes and out-accelerates Continental on ice by large margins (often 20-30%)
- Wet/dry advantage: Continental repeatedly wins wet braking and wet handling, and is steadier on dry asphalt
- Aquaplaning: Continental shows higher straight-aqua speeds (e.g., +8-10%), boosting slush/wet-road safety
- Noise/comfort: Continental tends to run quieter and more refined; Nokian is louder and less comfortable
- Overall results: Nokian wins all seven shared tests, driven by its superior winter-surface grip
- Efficiency: Results vary by test; Nokian occasionally edges rolling resistance, but both can be high for studded tyres
Overall Winner: Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.