Falken Azenis RS820 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
In the headline results, the Goodyear finishes comfortably ahead in every shared test (4/8 vs 7/8, 2/9 vs 8/9, and 3/7 vs 5/7). But the detail is more nuanced: the Falken repeatedly posts competitive (sometimes class-leading) dry braking and it dominates rolling resistance in all three tests, whereas the Goodyear repeatedly wins the handling and aquaplaning metrics that most affect confidence when you're driving hard or the weather turns.

Test Results
Independent comparison tyre tests are the best source of data to get tyre information from, and the good news is there have been three tests which compare both tyres directly!
| Tyre | Test Wins | Performance |
|---|---|---|
| Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport | three |
While it might look like the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport is better than the Falken Azenis RS820 purely based on the higher number of test wins, tyres are very complicated objects which means where one tyre is better than the other can be more important in real world use.
Let's look at how the two tyres compare across multiple tyre test categories.
Key Strengths
- Consistently best (lowest) rolling resistance across all three tests (efficiency advantage)
- Strong dry braking: wins 2/3 tests, including a notable 33.1m vs 34.1m in AutoBild
- Competitive wet braking in the 2026 performance test (26.29m vs 26.95m)
- Generally low noise in the 235/35 R19 test set (71.6dB vs 72.4dB in the 2026 performance test)
- Best-in-comparison handling performance: wins dry handling 3/3 and wet handling 3/3 (clear dynamic advantage)
- Stronger wet confidence and controllability per subjective scoring (e.g., 8.0 vs 7.25 subj. wet in 2026 performance test; 60 vs 54 in EVO)
- Better aquaplaning resistance across tests (wins straight aqua 3/3 and curved aqua 2/2 reported)
- More rounded 'driver's tyre' character in professional feedback: connected steering, balance, and ability to deploy power early
Dry Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during two dry braking tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 stopped the vehicle in 0.89% less distance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Dry Braking: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Dry Braking winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two dry handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.75% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Dry Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one dry handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.03% faster around a lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Dry Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Dry Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two subj. dry handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 19.2% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Dry Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Dry Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Road Score
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. road score tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 8.57% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Road Score: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Road Score winner was calculated >>
Wet Braking
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two wet braking tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport stopped the vehicle in 5.08% less distance than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Braking: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Braking winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [s]
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two wet handling [s] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 4.69% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Handling [s]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Handling [Km/H]
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet handling [km/h] tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 2.2% faster around a wet lap than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Handling [Km/H]: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Subj. Wet Handling
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two subj. wet handling tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 9.91% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Wet Handling: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Wet Handling winner was calculated >>
Wet Circle
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one wet circle tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was 0.09% faster around a wet circle than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Wet Circle: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Wet Circle winner was calculated >>
Straight Aqua
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during three straight aqua tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport floated at a 1.67% higher speed than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Straight Aqua: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Straight Aqua winner was calculated >>
Curved Aquaplaning
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during two curved aquaplaning tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport slipped out at a 8.24% higher speed than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Curved Aquaplaning: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Curved Aquaplaning winner was calculated >>
Subj. Comfort
Looking at data from one tyre tests, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport was better during one subj. comfort tests. On average the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport scored 6.9% more points than the Falken Azenis RS820.
Best In Subj. Comfort: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
See how the Subj. Comfort winner was calculated >>
Noise
Looking at data from two tyre tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during one noise tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 measured 0.14% quieter than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Noise: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Noise winner was calculated >>
Rolling Resistance
Looking at data from three tyre tests, the Falken Azenis RS820 was better during three rolling resistance tests. On average the Falken Azenis RS820 had a 6.43% lower rolling resistance than the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
Best In Rolling Resistance: Falken Azenis RS820
See how the Rolling Resistance winner was calculated >>
Real World Driver Reviews
Tyre Reviews also collects real world driver reviews for the Falken Azenis RS820 and Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.
In total the Falken Azenis RS820 has been reviewed 7 times and drivers have given the tyre 90% overall.
The Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has been reviewed 62 times and drivers have given the tyre 84% overall.
This means in real world driving, people prefer the Falken Azenis RS820.
Tyres I already drove on my 322hp Megane RS: PS4, PS4s, PS3, Nokian Powerproof and now the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport in 235/40/18.
Dry grip and feedback is great! Full throttle out of the corner is easy (works great with some added negative camber). It gives you so much confidence. The feedback is superb and now I really can push the car to its limits. I think they behave the same as the PS4s but it is difficult to compare because I've changed the suspension this year.
These Goodyears are a... Continue reading this review using the link below
Conclusion
The Falken Azenis RS820 makes a more compelling case if your priorities are day-to-day efficiency and respectable safety without chasing the last word in lap time. It takes 2 out of 3 dry-braking wins (including 33.1m vs 34.1m in the AutoBild test) and, most consistently, it's markedly lower in rolling resistance in every shared test (e.g., 8.5 vs 9.3 kg/t; 9.6 vs 10.4 kg/t). The trade-off is that it gives away meaningful time and confidence in wet handling and tends to be less reassuring at the limit in the rain-precisely where the Goodyear's advantage is most “felt,” not just measured.
Practical takeaway: if you drive hard, do fast-road runs, occasional track days, or simply want the most trustworthy wet-and-dry handling balance, the Goodyear remains the smarter buy-even if it's “showing its age” and may cost more at the pump. If you want a quieter/efficient performance tyre with strong braking moments and are willing to accept a step down in wet-circuit pace and ultimate precision, the Falken is the value-leaning alternative.
Key Differences
- Wet handling is the biggest separator: Goodyear is consistently faster (e.g., 77.73s vs 81.73s in EVO, ~4.9% gap), matching the testers' stronger subjective wet ratings.
- Aquaplaning margin favours Goodyear in every reported metric (straight aqua wins 3/3; curved aqua wins 2/2), which translates to more stability in heavy rain and standing water.
- Dry handling also consistently favours Goodyear (3/3 wins), even when dry braking is close-so it feels sharper and more precise at higher cornering loads.
- Braking is the Falken's counterpunch: it wins dry braking 2/3 and even edges wet braking in one test (26.29m vs 26.95m), but not enough to overcome handling deficits overall.
- Efficiency flips the script: Falken wins rolling resistance 3/3 (often by a meaningful margin, e.g., 9.6 vs 10.4 kg/t), while Goodyear is repeatedly flagged as weak here.
- Refinement is mixed: Goodyear scores better for comfort in the 2026 performance test (7.25 vs 6.75) and is described as very comfortable for the category, while noise results split depending on test/size.
Overall Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
Based on the tyre test data and user reviews we have in our database, the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport has demonstrated better overall performance in this comparison. However, as you can see from the spider diagram above, each tyre has its own strengths which should be considered in your final tyre buying choice.Similar Comparisons
Looking for more tyre comparisons? Here are other direct comparisons involving these tyres:
Falken Azenis RS820 Top Comparisons
Footnote
This page has been developed using tyre industry testing best practices. This means we are only comparing tests which have had both tyres in the same test.
Why is this important? Tyre testing is heavily affected by things like surface grip levels and surface temperature, which means you can only compare values from the same day. During a tyre test external condition changes are calculated into the overall results, but it is not possible to calculate this between tyre tests performed on different days or at different locations.
As a result you will see other tests on Tyre Reviews which feature both the %s and %s, but as they weren't conducted on the same day, the results are not comparable.
Lots of other websites do this sort of tyre comparison, Tyre Reviews doesn't.
Discussion
- No comments yet — be the first.