Menu

2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test

Jonathan Benson
Data analyzed and reviewed by Jonathan Benson
6 min read Updated
Contents
  1. Introduction
  2. Can the Bridgestone Compete?
  3. Dry
  4. Wet
  5. Environment
  6. Results
  7. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
  8. Continental Sport Contact 6
  9. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
  10. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
  11. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
  12. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
  13. Falken Azenis FK510
  14. Landsail LS588 UHP
  15. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1

Test Publication:
265/35 R20 9 tyres 4 categories
Images courtesy of Auto Bild Sportscars
Test Publication:
Auto Bild Sportscars
Images courtesy of Auto Bild Sportscars
Test Size: 265/35 R20
Tyres Tested: 9 tyres
Test Categories:
4 categories (8 tests)
Similar Tests
It's the test we've all been waiting for, it's the first test of the brand new Bridgestone Potenza Sport, the only new tyre in 2021 that has the chance of taking the fight to the established ultra high performance tyres such as the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, Continental SportContact 6 and Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport.

Naturally, it's the best testers in the business doing it first, the German publication Auto Bild. They've tested nine 265/35 R20 UUHP tyres in the dry and wet using a very un-european Ford Mustang.

Tyre Reviews is due to test the new Potenza Sport, against 14 of its key rivals in an 18" size, so if you're not already subscribed, be sure to head over to the Tyre Reviews YouTube channel and subscribe as that will be published in the coming weeks!

Can the Bridgestone Compete?

The biggest question is, can the new Potenza Sport really take the fight to Michelin, Continental and Goodyear? The answer, at least for this test, is a resounding yes!

The new Bridgestone Potenza Sport wins the test, and has the shortest dry braking, shortest wet braking, and fastest wet handling lap! The only one of the four key tests it was beaten in was dry handling, where it finished just 1.8% behind the Michelin, but the testers still reported it to have excellent handling and precise steering in the dry and wet.

The best of the rest went to the Continental Sport Contact 6. While it didn't win any test, and the testers found it to have a slightly high noise level, it was consistently close in all the tests, and had a dynamic sport driving behavio r in the wet.

The internet's favourite tyre,  the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S placed third overall, winning dry braking and having the lowest noise on test, but could only manage mid pack during the wet handling lap and was the most expensive set of tyres to buy.

The last of the "big 4" was the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport. Like the SportContact 6 it was consistent in all conditions, but couldn't quite match the best overall.

Dry

The new Potenza Sport led the way in dry braking, with the Goodyear just 0.1 meters ahead of the Continental and Michelin pairing.

Dry Braking

Spread: 4.50 M (12.8%)|Avg: 36.91 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S posted the fastest lap time by a considerable margin, and led the way subjectively. The Bridgestone could match the subjective handling of the Michelin, but not the time, and the Landsail and Berlin tyres provided little grip or enjoyment.

Dry Handling

Spread: 8.40 Km/H (8.4%)|Avg: 96.52 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    100.00 Km/H
  2. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    98.20 Km/H
  3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    98.10 Km/H
  4. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    98.00 Km/H
  5. Continental Sport Contact 6
    97.40 Km/H
  6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    97.00 Km/H
  7. Falken Azenis FK510
    95.40 Km/H
  8. Landsail LS588 UHP
    93.00 Km/H
  9. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    91.60 Km/H

Wet

The Bridgestone also led wet braking by a small margin.

Wet Braking

Spread: 41.60 M (101.2%)|Avg: 50.27 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre

Claiming three wins from the four key tests, the Potenza Sport was both the fastest and best handling tyre on test, with direct steering and first class balance. The Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R and Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport were also reported to be excellent handling tyres in the wet.

Wet Handling

Spread: 15.90 Km/H (18.6%)|Avg: 78.60 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
  1. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    85.50 Km/H
  2. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    82.60 Km/H
  3. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    82.10 Km/H
  4. Continental Sport Contact 6
    82.00 Km/H
  5. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    79.60 Km/H
  6. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    78.30 Km/H
  7. Falken Azenis FK510
    78.10 Km/H
  8. Landsail LS588 UHP
    69.60 Km/H
  9. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    69.60 Km/H

The Goodyear won the aquaplaning test, with a small margin to the second placed Falken.

Straight Aqua

Spread: 5.70 Km/H (7.6%)|Avg: 73.21 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
  1. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    75.30 Km/H
  2. Falken Azenis FK510
    75.10 Km/H
  3. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    74.60 Km/H
  4. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    74.60 Km/H
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    73.60 Km/H
  6. Continental Sport Contact 6
    72.80 Km/H
  7. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    72.70 Km/H
  8. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    70.60 Km/H
  9. Landsail LS588 UHP
    69.60 Km/H

Environment

The Michelin Pilot Sport 4S was the quietest tyre on test, matching the budget Landsail LS588.

Noise

Spread: 2.10 dB (2.9%)|Avg: 72.72 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
  1. Landsail LS588 UHP
    72.00 dB
  2. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    72.00 dB
  3. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    72.10 dB
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    72.20 dB
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    72.30 dB
  6. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    72.90 dB
  7. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    73.30 dB
  8. Continental Sport Contact 6
    73.60 dB
  9. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    74.10 dB

The budge tyre also had the lowest rolling resistance, a test the Goodyear and Vredestein struggled in.

Rolling Resistance

Spread: 2.24 kg / t (29.4%)|Avg: 8.99 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
  1. Landsail LS588 UHP
    7.62 kg / t
  2. Continental Sport Contact 6
    8.57 kg / t
  3. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    8.88 kg / t
  4. Falken Azenis FK510
    8.92 kg / t
  5. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    9.11 kg / t
  6. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    9.15 kg / t
  7. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    9.19 kg / t
  8. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    9.60 kg / t
  9. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    9.86 kg / t

19,000 km
£1.45/L
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2

Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.

Michelin wasn't the only expensive tyre on test, with the Goodyear matching its price for four. The new Bridgestone was also expensive, but a full 75 euros cheaper for a set of four.

Price

Spread: 630.00 (126%)|Avg: 858.33
Price in local currency (Lower is better)
  1. Landsail LS588 UHP
    500.00
  2. Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
    530.00
  3. Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
    790.00
  4. Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
    795.00
  5. Falken Azenis FK510
    810.00
  6. Continental Sport Contact 6
    985.00
  7. Bridgestone Potenza Sport
    1055.00
  8. Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
    1130.00
  9. Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
    1130.00

Results

1st

Bridgestone Potenza Sport

265/35 R20 99Y
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
  • EU Label: C/A/73
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 1st 35.1 M 100%
Dry Handling 2nd 98.2 Km/H 100 Km/H -1.8 Km/H 98.2%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 1st 41.1 M 100%
Wet Handling 1st 85.5 Km/H 100%
Straight Aqua 3rd 74.6 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -0.7 Km/H 99.07%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 6th 72.9 dB 72 dB +0.9 dB 98.77%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 7th 1055 500 +555 47.39%
Rolling Resistance 6th 9.15 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.53 kg / t 83.28%
2nd

Continental Sport Contact 6

265/35 R20 99Y
Continental Sport Contact 6
  • EU Label: E/A/72
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 35.5 M 35.1 M +0.4 M 98.87%
Dry Handling 5th 97.4 Km/H 100 Km/H -2.6 Km/H 97.4%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 2nd 41.2 M 41.1 M +0.1 M 99.76%
Wet Handling 4th 82 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -3.5 Km/H 95.91%
Straight Aqua 6th 72.8 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -2.5 Km/H 96.68%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 8th 73.6 dB 72 dB +1.6 dB 97.83%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 6th 985 500 +485 50.76%
Rolling Resistance 2nd 8.57 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +0.95 kg / t 88.91%
3rd

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S

265/35 R20 99Y
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
  • EU Label: C/A/71
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 3rd 35.5 M 35.1 M +0.4 M 98.87%
Dry Handling 1st 100 Km/H 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 3rd 43.3 M 41.1 M +2.2 M 94.92%
Wet Handling 5th 79.6 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -5.9 Km/H 93.1%
Straight Aqua 7th 72.7 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -2.6 Km/H 96.55%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 1st 72 dB 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 8th 1130 500 +630 44.25%
Rolling Resistance 3rd 8.88 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.26 kg / t 85.81%
4th

Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport

265/35 R20 99Y
Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport
  • EU Label: E/A/72
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 2nd 35.4 M 35.1 M +0.3 M 99.15%
Dry Handling 4th 98 Km/H 100 Km/H -2 Km/H 98%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 5th 45.1 M 41.1 M +4 M 91.13%
Wet Handling 3rd 82.1 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -3.4 Km/H 96.02%
Straight Aqua 1st 75.3 Km/H 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 7th 73.3 dB 72 dB +1.3 dB 98.23%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 8th 1130 500 +630 44.25%
Rolling Resistance 8th 9.6 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.98 kg / t 79.38%
5th

Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R

265/35 R20 99Y
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti R
  • EU Label: E/B/70
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 5th 36.7 M 35.1 M +1.6 M 95.64%
Dry Handling 3rd 98.1 Km/H 100 Km/H -1.9 Km/H 98.1%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 6th 46.4 M 41.1 M +5.3 M 88.58%
Wet Handling 2nd 82.6 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -2.9 Km/H 96.61%
Straight Aqua 3rd 74.6 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -0.7 Km/H 99.07%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 4th 72.2 dB 72 dB +0.2 dB 99.72%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 4th 795 500 +295 62.89%
Rolling Resistance 9th 9.86 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +2.24 kg / t 77.28%
6th

Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3

265/35 R20 99Y
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
  • EU Label: C/A/73
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 6th 36.8 M 35.1 M +1.7 M 95.38%
Dry Handling 6th 97 Km/H 100 Km/H -3 Km/H 97%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 4th 44.4 M 41.1 M +3.3 M 92.57%
Wet Handling 6th 78.3 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -7.2 Km/H 91.58%
Straight Aqua 5th 73.6 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -1.7 Km/H 97.74%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 9th 74.1 dB 72 dB +2.1 dB 97.17%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 3rd 790 500 +290 63.29%
Rolling Resistance 5th 9.11 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.49 kg / t 83.64%
7th

Falken Azenis FK510

265/35 R20 99Y
Falken Azenis FK510
  • EU Label: C/A/71
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 7th 38.4 M 35.1 M +3.3 M 91.41%
Dry Handling 7th 95.4 Km/H 100 Km/H -4.6 Km/H 95.4%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 7th 48.6 M 41.1 M +7.5 M 84.57%
Wet Handling 7th 78.1 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -7.4 Km/H 91.35%
Straight Aqua 2nd 75.1 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -0.2 Km/H 99.73%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 5th 72.3 dB 72 dB +0.3 dB 99.59%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 5th 810 500 +310 61.73%
Rolling Resistance 4th 8.92 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.3 kg / t 85.43%
8th

Landsail LS588 UHP

265/35 R20 99Y
Landsail LS588 UHP
  • EU Label: C/B/70
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 8th 39.2 M 35.1 M +4.1 M 89.54%
Dry Handling 8th 93 Km/H 100 Km/H -7 Km/H 93%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 9th 82.7 M 41.1 M +41.6 M 49.7%
Wet Handling 8th 69.6 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -15.9 Km/H 81.4%
Straight Aqua 9th 69.6 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -5.7 Km/H 92.43%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 1st 72 dB 100%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 1st 500 100%
Rolling Resistance 1st 7.62 kg / t 100%
9th

Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1

265/35 R20 99Y
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
  • EU Label: B/C/73
Test # Result Best Diff %
Dry Braking 9th 39.6 M 35.1 M +4.5 M 88.64%
Dry Handling 9th 91.6 Km/H 100 Km/H -8.4 Km/H 91.6%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Wet Braking 8th 59.6 M 41.1 M +18.5 M 68.96%
Wet Handling 8th 69.6 Km/H 85.5 Km/H -15.9 Km/H 81.4%
Straight Aqua 8th 70.6 Km/H 75.3 Km/H -4.7 Km/H 93.76%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Noise 3rd 72.1 dB 72 dB +0.1 dB 99.86%
Test # Result Best Diff %
Price 2nd 530 500 +30 94.34%
Rolling Resistance 7th 9.19 kg / t 7.62 kg / t +1.57 kg / t 82.92%

Discussion

30 comments
  1. light767 archived

    Hi

    I have always mounted Bridgestone Potenza S001 on my Alfa Romeo Giulietta because of their rigidy of the structure of the tyre than can counterbalance the rolling behaviour of my car; so is this new Potenza sport still rigid in confront to the old S001?

    Thanks.

    #7694
  2. Master Yeti archived

    Can you include a Pirelli option?

    #6806
    1. TyreReviews Master Yeti archived

      This wasn't my test, I always try to include pirelli

      #7696
  3. Robert Tajeb archived

    Hi,
    I will be buying new summer tires for next year spring because my all season tires are almost finished also I already have dedicated wheels for winter. Since my car has staggered wheel setup (18 inch AMG) there will be a bit of issue to find exact size that my car needs in my country (Finland). This Bridgestone tires looks enticing for me to try if the price is around the same with Continental Premium Contact 6.
    Is there anyone who already tried both tires (Potenza Sport and Premium Contact 6) ? Can someone share their experience please ?
    I'm not an aggressive driver (quick acceleration and late braking) type but here in Finland the street is mostly empty so sometimes we can drive quite fast (not that fast to lose your license though).

    #6804
    1. TyreReviews Robert Tajeb archived

      I have, the video will be out in around a week :)

      #6805
  4. Rafał Kaniewski archived

    Hello TyreReviews, I checked all of available tests, but don't see any concrete review for the most comfort and quite tires. I'm driving now with 275/35/20 and 245/40/20 Pirello PZero RF and I'm very dissapointed with comfort and noise driving. I'm driving mostly on country roads and highways in a very easy way (60-70kkm per year) occasional sporty driving. I decided to go with new PS4S and have some concerns if this is a right choice if I'm not a Max Verstappen and mostly enjoy the easy and peacefull driving. Have you any suggestions ?

    #6667
    1. TyreReviews Rafał Kaniewski archived

      I think you'll be happy with your choice. Moving away from runflats to normal tyres will bring a huge improvement in comfort. Let me know how you find them :)

      #6670
    2. Kolemjdouci Rafał Kaniewski archived

      More comfortable and still allowing occasional sporty driving should be Conti PC6.

      #6671
  5. ferongr archived

    Finally a UUHP tire very close to my size. (I'm using 205/40/R17 and the BPS is available at 215/40/R17). Prices are reasonable too. I currently run PS4s (non-s version) and I'm somewhat disappointed with them regarding sidewall stiffness.

    #6582
    1. TyreReviews ferongr archived

      If you make the swap please report back! Sadly I can't test every size of a tyre, so it's really good to hear real world experiences, especially from people with a similar view of the PS4 to me :) If you don't go Bridgestone, go PC6 for some added stiffness!

      #6587
      1. Kurt Phillips TyreReviews archived

        I also agree about the PS4, great tyre but very dull. My work car will be getting PC6 when it's due some tyres, but I've actually ordered a set of Potenza Sport's for the front of my soon to be 360hp Leon Cupra.

        I've been waiting for so long for Bridgestone to bring a new competitive UHP tyre and what a tyre they have made! Two tests so far and two great results. Going toe to toe and also beating PS4S in areas is great, the only question mark now is how long they will last. We shall see, and I'll be sure to leave a review after a few thousand miles of driving.

        I'm excited about the potential for a new track focused road tyre under the Potenza Sport branding, initially from the collaboration with Lamborghini and their new STO. Hopefully they offer them in a board range of sizes and also bring the fight to Michelin in this segment as well.

        #6644
  6. Igor Sarić archived

    I always had my cars on UUHP tires from Michelin, GY, Conti and Bridgestone over past 20+ years. This year I opted for Potenza Sport and I really love them. I can see that I made the right choice - the grip is simply relentless and fantastic feedback from the tires. Mine are 235/35 R20

    #6579
    1. TyreReviews Igor Sarić archived

      Igor, we currently don't have any reviews of the Potenza Sport - https://www.tyrereviews.com... it would be really great if you could leave one, you're the first person I know to have run them in the real world! ?

      #6586
  7. Maauru archived

    NIce to see Bridgestone Potenza Sport doing so well.
    I am due to buy new summer tyres next spring 2022 and I am looking into Bridgestone Potenza Sport.
    As I am buying in 225/45 R 17 dimensions than I guess Bridgestone advantage should be even bigger as this tyre does exist in this dimensions while Michelin/GoodYear/Continental in such dimensions only have "lower" models (PS4 instead PS4S, PC6 instead SC6, F1 Asym5 instead od F1 SuperSport).

    #6570
    1. TyreReviews Maauru archived

      I'm testing it against those in my UHP test this year (18")

      #6573
      1. Maauru TyreReviews archived

        Looking forward to see it, specially video :)

        #6574
        1. TyreReviews Maauru archived

          I'm looking forward to doing it! IT was meant to be next week but delayed due to obvious reasons :(

          #6575
      2. Luijazzpiano TyreReviews archived

        Theoretically if it's as good as PS4S, F1SS and SC6, it should be winning easily against PS4, Asym 5 and PC6. Isn't it. (At least dry performance wise)

        #6577
        1. TyreReviews Luijazzpiano archived

          Yes and no. I understand your theory, however there's always the chance that Bridgestone have made the smaller sizes a different construction to the bigger, like the PS4 / PS4S, but just kept the same name for halo effect.

          Fortunately I will be testing it against the PS4, PS4S, F1 A5 and F1 SuperSport + others ??

          #6578
          1. Luijazzpiano TyreReviews archived

            That's true too. That's why I normally only read tests that use my size or at least the same total wheel size. (I have 225/45R17 so 225/40R18 tests are fine for me too) I so realize some tyres work better in certain sizes, or car weight. So yeah I would have to wait for a test in one of these 2 sizes if I want a more accurate comparison for me.

            #6581
            1. TyreReviews Luijazzpiano archived

              All things going well my test / video should be up first week of May :)

              #6585
          2. Darius TyreReviews archived

            I fully agree . I think sidewall height matters as well. I have on my car 225 45 R17 Asymmetric 5 which has sidewall made from 1 layer of polyester whereas same Asymmetric 5 225 40R18 ( and guess lower profiles) has double layer of polyester which may indicate better steering feel/performance .
            From my experience It looks like 17inch tyres don't offer much steering feel.

            Looking forward to see the test you mentioned since it includes both latest UUHP and UHP tyres.

            #6583
            1. TassieLorenzo Darius archived

              Potenza S007A (Asian & NA market, made in Japan) has excellent steering feel in 17", hopefully the Potenza Sport (EU market, made in EU) is just as good!

              #6802
          3. Guess Who TyreReviews archived

            It's very possible 19 inch and up are made with different compound, just like Pirelli did with P Zero.

            #6643
    2. Luijazzpiano Maauru archived

      Exactly! There is almost no competitor in 225 45 R17.

      #6576