Test Publication:
Auto Zeitung
205/55 R16
14 tyres
5 categories
Test Size:
205/55 R16
Tyres Tested:
14 tyres
Auto Zeitung is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
The 2020 Auto Zeitung has tested fourteen winter tyres in 205/55 R16, including new winter tyres from Bridgestone, Goodyear and Maxxis, as well as a low cost retreaded tyre.
While all the tyres were tested in the dry, wet and snow, sadly Auto Zeitung didn't include any handling data, instead just providing subjective feel scoring. They do a really good job of talking about how the tyres performed in their full article, so we encourage you to head over to AutoZeitung.com and check out the full test where you can also see data such as slalom speeds which we've not included.
Overall, the results confirm the trend we're seeing in 2020, with the Bridgestone Blizzak LM005 taking a dominating win, largely thanks to it's incredible wet performance which saw it stopping 3.4 meters ahead of the second best tyre in wet braking!
The should-have-been-replaced-by-now Continental WinterContact TS860 finished a solid second, with the Goodyear UltraGrip 9+ taking third, matching the excellent performances of the larger Goodyear UltraGrip Performance+.
Dry
Dry braking was won by Hankook, showing an impressive advantage over the next best Bridgestone.
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Goodride SW608
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
Subjectively, the testers liked the feel of the Toyo, which was also the fastest tyre through the dry slalom.
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Michelin Alpin 6
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Goodride SW608
Wet
The Bridgestone had a huge advantage during wet braking, stopping the test Golf 3.4 meters ahead of the second best Continental. While the Toyo struggled, it was still nearly 7 meters ahead of the retreaded winter tyre.
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Goodride SW608
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
Subjective wet handling had a similar order to wet braking, highlighting the advantage of having grip when driving quickly...
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Goodride SW608
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
Hankook and Bridgestone scored best during the aquaplaning testing, which is even more impressive when you consider the braking performance of the tyres.
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Goodride SW608
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
Snow
While the Fulda tyre struggled in the dry and wet, it was impressive during snow braking, finishing joint top with the aging Dunlop WinterSport 5.
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Goodride SW608
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
- Toyo Snowprox S954
Bridgestone rounded out its impressive performance by scoring the best during subjective snow handling.
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Goodride SW608
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
The snow traction test was won by Goodyear.
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- Goodride SW608
Environment
The snow expert Fulda had the lowest rolling resistance on test.
The best tyres on test overall are also some of the best during subjective comfort testing.
- Michelin Alpin 6
- Goodyear UltraGrip 9 Plus
- Dunlop Winter Sport 5
- Hankook Winter i cept RS2
- Continental WinterContact TS 860
- Bridgestone Blizzak LM005
- Nexen Winguard Snow G3
- Maxxis Premitra Snow WP6
- Fulda Kristall Control HP2
- Falken Eurowinter HS01
- Goodride SW608
- Pirelli Cinturato Winter
- Toyo Snowprox S954
- King Meiler Winter Tact WT81
Results
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
46.5 M |
45.8 M |
+0.7 M |
98.49% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
50.9 M |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
82.8 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
26 M |
25.7 M |
+0.3 M |
98.85% |
| Snow Traction |
2nd |
2175 N |
2193 N |
-18 N |
99.18% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
3rd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
12th |
340 |
170 |
+170 |
50% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.4 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.34 kg / t |
95.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
48.7 M |
45.8 M |
+2.9 M |
94.05% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
54.3 M |
50.9 M |
+3.4 M |
93.74% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.2 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-5 Km/H |
94.13% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
25.9 M |
25.7 M |
+0.2 M |
99.23% |
| Snow Traction |
6th |
2146 N |
2193 N |
-47 N |
97.86% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
3rd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
12th |
340 |
170 |
+170 |
50% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.47 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.41 kg / t |
95.16% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
48.4 M |
45.8 M |
+2.6 M |
94.63% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
55.4 M |
50.9 M |
+4.5 M |
91.88% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
5th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
82.3 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-2.9 Km/H |
96.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
26.1 M |
25.7 M |
+0.4 M |
98.47% |
| Snow Traction |
1st |
2193 N |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
2nd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
320 |
170 |
+150 |
53.13% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.26 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.2 kg / t |
97.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
45.8 M |
|
|
100% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
55.1 M |
50.9 M |
+4.2 M |
92.38% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
5th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
85.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
26 M |
25.7 M |
+0.3 M |
98.85% |
| Snow Traction |
3rd |
2171 N |
2193 N |
-22 N |
99% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
3rd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
280 |
170 |
+110 |
60.71% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
9.12 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+1.06 kg / t |
88.38% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
47.5 M |
45.8 M |
+1.7 M |
96.42% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
54.4 M |
50.9 M |
+3.5 M |
93.57% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
76.5 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-8.7 Km/H |
89.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
26.2 M |
25.7 M |
+0.5 M |
98.09% |
| Snow Traction |
5th |
2152 N |
2193 N |
-41 N |
98.13% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
6th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
14th |
380 |
170 |
+210 |
44.74% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.48 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.42 kg / t |
95.05% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
12th |
48.8 M |
45.8 M |
+3 M |
93.85% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
6th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
55.5 M |
50.9 M |
+4.6 M |
91.71% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
5th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
76.7 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-8.5 Km/H |
90.02% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
25.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
9th |
2132 N |
2193 N |
-61 N |
97.22% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
3rd |
9 Points |
10 Points |
-1 Points |
90% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
11th |
330 |
170 |
+160 |
51.52% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8.17 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.11 kg / t |
98.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
48.3 M |
45.8 M |
+2.5 M |
94.82% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
12th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
56.9 M |
50.9 M |
+6 M |
89.46% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
8th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
82 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-3.2 Km/H |
96.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
26.3 M |
25.7 M |
+0.6 M |
97.72% |
| Snow Traction |
4th |
2170 N |
2193 N |
-23 N |
98.95% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
4th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
11th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
300 |
170 |
+130 |
56.67% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.88 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.82 kg / t |
90.77% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
47.7 M |
45.8 M |
+1.9 M |
96.02% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
7th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
5th |
55.4 M |
50.9 M |
+4.5 M |
91.88% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
4th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
79.9 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-5.3 Km/H |
93.78% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
26.5 M |
25.7 M |
+0.8 M |
96.98% |
| Snow Traction |
7th |
2144 N |
2193 N |
-49 N |
97.77% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
11th |
2 Points |
10 Points |
-8 Points |
20% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
8th |
7 Points |
10 Points |
-3 Points |
70% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
300 |
170 |
+130 |
56.67% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
9.42 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+1.36 kg / t |
85.56% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
47.2 M |
45.8 M |
+1.4 M |
97.03% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
3rd |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
57.1 M |
50.9 M |
+6.2 M |
89.14% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
9th |
3 Points |
10 Points |
-7 Points |
30% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
79.3 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-5.9 Km/H |
93.08% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
26.5 M |
25.7 M |
+0.8 M |
96.98% |
| Snow Traction |
12th |
2078 N |
2193 N |
-115 N |
94.76% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
9th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
9th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
280 |
170 |
+110 |
60.71% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
9.21 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+1.15 kg / t |
87.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
50.1 M |
45.8 M |
+4.3 M |
91.42% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
12th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
58.2 M |
50.9 M |
+7.3 M |
87.46% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
12th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
75 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-10.2 Km/H |
88.03% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
25.7 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Traction |
10th |
2123 N |
2193 N |
-70 N |
96.81% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
8th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
9th |
6 Points |
10 Points |
-4 Points |
60% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
300 |
170 |
+130 |
56.67% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
8.06 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
46.7 M |
45.8 M |
+0.9 M |
98.07% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
59.1 M |
50.9 M |
+8.2 M |
86.13% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
10th |
2 Points |
10 Points |
-8 Points |
20% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
71.8 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-13.4 Km/H |
84.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
26.5 M |
25.7 M |
+0.8 M |
96.98% |
| Snow Traction |
8th |
2138 N |
2193 N |
-55 N |
97.49% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
10th |
3 Points |
10 Points |
-7 Points |
30% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
7th |
8 Points |
10 Points |
-2 Points |
80% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
220 |
170 |
+50 |
77.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.81 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.75 kg / t |
91.49% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
47.8 M |
45.8 M |
+2 M |
95.82% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
1st |
10 Points |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
61.5 M |
50.9 M |
+10.6 M |
82.76% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
12th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
77.2 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-8 Km/H |
90.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
14th |
27.3 M |
25.7 M |
+1.6 M |
94.14% |
| Snow Traction |
13th |
2067 N |
2193 N |
-126 N |
94.25% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
13th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
13th |
4 Points |
10 Points |
-6 Points |
40% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
230 |
170 |
+60 |
73.91% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
9.41 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+1.35 kg / t |
85.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
47.8 M |
45.8 M |
+2 M |
95.82% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
14th |
3 Points |
10 Points |
-7 Points |
30% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
58.6 M |
50.9 M |
+7.7 M |
86.86% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
10th |
2 Points |
10 Points |
-8 Points |
20% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
71.1 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-14.1 Km/H |
83.45% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
26.1 M |
25.7 M |
+0.4 M |
98.47% |
| Snow Traction |
14th |
2039 N |
2193 N |
-154 N |
92.98% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
11th |
2 Points |
10 Points |
-8 Points |
20% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
11th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
200 |
170 |
+30 |
85% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.74 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+0.68 kg / t |
92.22% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
50.1 M |
45.8 M |
+4.3 M |
91.42% |
| Subj. Dry Handling |
9th |
5 Points |
10 Points |
-5 Points |
50% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
14th |
67.3 M |
50.9 M |
+16.4 M |
75.63% |
| Subj. Wet Handling |
12th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Straight Aqua |
14th |
67.1 Km/H |
85.2 Km/H |
-18.1 Km/H |
78.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
13th |
27 M |
25.7 M |
+1.3 M |
95.19% |
| Snow Traction |
11th |
2087 N |
2193 N |
-106 N |
95.17% |
| Subj. Snow Handling |
13th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Subj. Comfort |
14th |
1 Points |
10 Points |
-9 Points |
10% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
170 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
9.22 kg / t |
8.06 kg / t |
+1.16 kg / t |
87.42% |
I´m a bit confused to see the non-tested Goodride SW608 in the tabs ;) . Isn´t it the Trazano?
Again a victory of the LM005. But after some bad experiences with the last Bridgestone summer and winter tyres prevent me from recommending Bridgestone-tyres since years. And the predecessor LM001 Evo shows the worst performance by far in the TÜV-test (commissioned by Michelin) with 2mm tread. After my experience with the Yokohama V905 which was extreme dangerous with over 5mm tread I take care with buying winter tyres.
And Autozeitung.com don´t exist if I´m not wrong.
Sorry, I should have noted I swapped the SW608 to Goodride as we don't list Trazano. As you well know, it's the same tyre ;)
I'd love to see some wear data on the LM005 (and other winter tyres) but as it stands, with the information we have from tests, the LM005 is exceptional
ADAC and AutoBild lists wear data, maybe I get you wrong?
The problem with the LM001 Evo was not the overall wear but the big lost of snow-performance with less tread. Reminds me of my Yokohama V905 which was good in the beginning but had an awful snow-performance with over 5mm tread. It was so bad that I decided to buy new winter tyres in mid of december.
And the LM32 was on wet in the 3rd season also awful, experiences like that keep me away from Bridgestone winter tyres.
Hope next year some new tyres like Conti TS870 and Pirelli P Zero Winter will show up in the tests.
You're right they do, but they don't test them once worn. I'm trying to arrange this.
I´m not sure whether it is worth the effort. It´s not only the low tread, there are some other factors which happen, like sunbeam, kind of storage which affects the grip on tyres
You are correct, which is why it's so expensive and difficult to test, as you need to factor in tyre wear and aging
With 2 mm tread left should each tyre be dumped and recycled, no need to test.
Yep, that´t what I do ealier. But after my V905 I know there´s a big difference on snowgrip long before the tread is down to 2mm
Good to see that Bridgestone (loved my RE720s on my old 90s Micra but absolutely hated the OEM ER30s fitted to my Mazda3 that replaced in back in 2006) now seemingly consistently back on form. A good result for Hankook too, especially with the lower price in their favour.
If both keep doing well, I'll certainly give them consideration when changing my A/S CC+s next time (admitedly that won't be for a good few years yet unless I change cars again)
Bridgestone are storming it this winter, they'll be my number one recommendation in the "top winter tyres for 2020" video (if I ever make it)