In an unexpected release, Auto Bild have just published their second ultra high performance tyre test of 2021, this time testing the popular 235/35 R19 tyre size and again putting the new Bridgestone Potenza Sport up against the best from Continental and Michelin. Strangely, Auto Bild have included the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 instead of the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport which would have been a more natural selection for this group, but it's still a really interesting test.
As always, things are close at the top, with Michelin taking a narrow victory, just ahead of Bridgestone and Continental in joint second place.
Read on below for the gritty details, and testers notes on each tyre, and be sure to check out the full test on the Auto Bild website.
Dry
Dry braking was led by the often dominant Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, with the Continental SportContact 6 close behind.
A rather large 5.5 meters separated the best and worst tyres on test.
Dry Braking
Spread: 5.50 M (16.4%)|Avg: 35.57 M
Dry braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Dry Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
While the new Bridgestone Potenza Sport could only manage fourth in dry braking, it was the fastest around the dry handling lap by a significant margin.
Dry Handling
Spread: 6.00 Km/H (5%)|Avg: 116.82 Km/H
Dry Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
119.70 Km/H
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
118.80 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
118.40 Km/H
Continental Sport Contact 6
117.80 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
117.60 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
117.20 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
117.10 Km/H
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
117.00 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport A
116.70 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
116.50 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
116.00 Km/H
Syron Premium Performance
115.80 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
115.70 Km/H
Barum Bravuris 5HM
114.30 Km/H
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
113.70 Km/H
Wet
Wet braking was again led by the impressive Michelin, in a sequence of results extremely similar to the dry braking.
Auto Bild actually tested braking on a high and low grip surface, below is the results of the low grip, you can find the results of the high grip surface on the Auto Bild website.
Wet Braking
Spread: 17.70 M (38.9%)|Avg: 52.73 M
Wet braking in meters (100 - 0 km/h) (Lower is better)
Wet Braking: Safety Impact: Best vs Worst Tyre
The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 was the fastest around the wet handling lap, with an impressive lead ahead of Michelin and Continental.
Wet Handling
Spread: 12.90 Km/H (16.7%)|Avg: 71.80 Km/H
Wet Handling Average Speed (Higher is better)
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
77.20 Km/H
Continental Sport Contact 6
74.20 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
74.00 Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.90 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
73.80 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport A
73.10 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
72.90 Km/H
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
72.70 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72.60 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
72.40 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
70.90 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69.90 Km/H
Barum Bravuris 5HM
68.50 Km/H
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
66.60 Km/H
Syron Premium Performance
64.30 Km/H
The now aging Dunlop SportMaxx RT2 led the way in both aquaplaning tests.
Straight Aqua
Spread: 10.60 Km/H (14.1%)|Avg: 71.94 Km/H
Float Speed in Km/H (Higher is better)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
75.30 Km/H
Continental Sport Contact 6
74.70 Km/H
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
74.40 Km/H
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
74.10 Km/H
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
74.00 Km/H
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
73.60 Km/H
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
73.10 Km/H
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
73.10 Km/H
Toyo Proxes Sport A
72.20 Km/H
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
71.60 Km/H
Nokian PowerProof
71.20 Km/H
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
69.90 Km/H
Barum Bravuris 5HM
69.50 Km/H
Syron Premium Performance
67.70 Km/H
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
64.70 Km/H
Curved Aquaplaning
Spread: 0.95 m/sec2 (34.1%)|Avg: 2.43 m/sec2
Remaining lateral acceleration (Higher is better)
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
2.79 m/sec2
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
2.72 m/sec2
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
2.62 m/sec2
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
2.57 m/sec2
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
2.54 m/sec2
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
2.52 m/sec2
Toyo Proxes Sport A
2.50 m/sec2
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
2.43 m/sec2
Nokian PowerProof
2.38 m/sec2
Barum Bravuris 5HM
2.38 m/sec2
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
2.34 m/sec2
Continental Sport Contact 6
2.33 m/sec2
Syron Premium Performance
2.27 m/sec2
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
2.15 m/sec2
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
1.84 m/sec2
Environment
The external noise test bumped the budget "Berlin Tyres" to the top of the group.
Noise
Spread: 2.90 dB (4.1%)|Avg: 72.47 dB
External noise in dB (Lower is better)
Continental Sport Contact 6
71.50 dB
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
71.50 dB
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
71.70 dB
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
71.80 dB
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
71.90 dB
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
71.90 dB
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
72.00 dB
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
72.30 dB
Toyo Proxes Sport A
72.30 dB
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
72.40 dB
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
72.50 dB
Nokian PowerProof
73.10 dB
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
73.70 dB
Syron Premium Performance
74.00 dB
Barum Bravuris 5HM
74.40 dB
The cheapest tyres in the group happened to have the lowest rolling resistance, which is a little unusual for such a test.
Rolling Resistance
Spread: 1.99 kg / t (25.2%)|Avg: 8.96 kg / t
Rolling resistance in kg t (Lower is better)
Syron Premium Performance
7.91 kg / t
Kleber Dynaxer UHP
8.41 kg / t
Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
8.42 kg / t
Continental Sport Contact 6
8.43 kg / t
Barum Bravuris 5HM
8.44 kg / t
Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
8.71 kg / t
Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
8.80 kg / t
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
8.87 kg / t
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
8.96 kg / t
Nokian PowerProof
9.26 kg / t
Maxxis Victra Sport 5
9.34 kg / t
Toyo Proxes Sport A
9.48 kg / t
Bridgestone Potenza Sport
9.57 kg / t
Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
9.90 kg / t
Pirelli P Zero PZ4
9.90 kg / t
19,000 km
£1.45/L
8.0 L/100km
--
Annual Difference
--
Lifetime Savings
--
Extra Fuel/Energy
--
Extra CO2
Estimates based on typical driving conditions. Rolling resistance accounts for approximately 20% of IC vehicle fuel consumption and 25% of EV energy consumption. Actual savings vary based on driving style, vehicle weight, road conditions, and tyre age. For comparative purposes only. Lifetime savings based on a 40,000km / 25,000 mile tread life.
As usual, the Michelin was the most expensive tyre on test, over twice the price of the cheapest tyres.
hi, i have a question about the tire. I watched last year’s tests and can’t decide which one to buy. I have dimension 235 / 35R19. I choose between hankook s1 evo3, ultrac vorti +. I drive calmly, sometimes dynamically, I drive 10-12k a year. I want a tire that is safe in the wet and good in the dry. I know that you are the best at this and your opinion would help me the most.
My personal winner is the Pirelli PZ4. Looks like it´s very good in Handling. Some surprises: The old Dunlop RT2 is at same level as the newer Goodyear F1 A5, strong result of the Ultrac Vorti.
The two worst tyres are from Keskin who say these tyres are engineered in Germany, but it´s manufactured for a cheap price somewhere else
The Pirelli seems to do very well in the wet handling tests and it is not shabby in the dry either. If they could sort the rolling resistance they would be up there with the best.
I wonder if the dual compound is limited to the OEM sport car variants.
I´m not sure whether rolling resistance and wet handling can be combined optimal. The best tyre in rolling resistance is the 14th place and have awful wet grip.
Looks like Conti came close to a good compromise, but the other good tyres in the wet handling, the PZ4 and the Potenza are far away in rolling resistance
My personal opinion: Wet handling is much more important than rolling resistance. I´ve drive for many years company cars with tyres like Michelin Energy Saver and Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance and would not buy it for my own car.
opinion on falken fk510 in this dimension? better than hankook?
I'd guess they'd be very close! FK520 is now out though
hi, i have a question about the tire. I watched last year’s tests and can’t decide which one to buy. I have dimension 235 / 35R19. I choose between hankook s1 evo3, ultrac vorti +. I drive calmly, sometimes dynamically, I drive 10-12k a year. I want a tire that is safe in the wet and good in the dry. I know that you are the best at this and your opinion would help me the most.
thank you very much
I would take the Hankook of those two.
thank you.
What was the test car? Gutted I haven't tried my new Bridgestones yet as I've not had my car for over 3 weeks :(
I believe it was the Seat Cupra R, basically a Golf GTI in a dress :)
My personal winner is the Pirelli PZ4. Looks like it´s very good in Handling.
Some surprises: The old Dunlop RT2 is at same level as the newer Goodyear F1 A5, strong result of the Ultrac Vorti.
The two worst tyres are from Keskin who say these tyres are engineered in Germany, but it´s manufactured for a cheap price somewhere else
The Pirelli seems to do very well in the wet handling tests and it is not shabby in the dry either. If they could sort the rolling resistance they would be up there with the best.
I wonder if the dual compound is limited to the OEM sport car variants.
I´m not sure whether rolling resistance and wet handling can be combined optimal. The best tyre in rolling resistance is the 14th place and have awful wet grip.
Looks like Conti came close to a good compromise, but the other good tyres in the wet handling, the PZ4 and the Potenza are far away in rolling resistance
My personal opinion: Wet handling is much more important than rolling resistance. I´ve drive for many years company cars with tyres like Michelin Energy Saver and Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance and would not buy it for my own car.
I think you are performing these weeks a test with a very similar group of tyres. It will be interesting to see if the results look like similar!
You are correct, and yes it will be :)