Test Publication:
Auto Bild Sportscars
235/35 R19
15 tyres
4 categories
Test Size:
235/35 R19
Tyres Tested:
15 tyres
Auto Bild Sportscars is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
In an unexpected release, Auto Bild have just published their second ultra high performance tyre test of 2021, this time testing the popular 235/35 R19 tyre size and again putting the new Bridgestone Potenza Sport up against the best from Continental and Michelin. Strangely, Auto Bild have included the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 instead of the Goodyear Eagle F1 SuperSport which would have been a more natural selection for this group, but it's still a really interesting test.
As always, things are close at the top, with Michelin taking a narrow victory, just ahead of Bridgestone and Continental in joint second place.
Read on below for the gritty details, and testers notes on each tyre, and be sure to check out the full test on the Auto Bild website.
Dry
Dry braking was led by the often dominant Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, with the Continental SportContact 6 close behind.
A rather large 5.5 meters separated the best and worst tyres on test.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Syron Premium Performance
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
While the new Bridgestone Potenza Sport could only manage fourth in dry braking, it was the fastest around the dry handling lap by a significant margin.
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Syron Premium Performance
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
Wet
Wet braking was again led by the impressive Michelin, in a sequence of results extremely similar to the dry braking.
Auto Bild actually tested braking on a high and low grip surface, below is the results of the low grip, you can find the results of the high grip surface on the Auto Bild website.
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Nokian PowerProof
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
- Syron Premium Performance
The Pirelli P Zero PZ4 was the fastest around the wet handling lap, with an impressive lead ahead of Michelin and Continental.
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Nokian PowerProof
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
- Syron Premium Performance
The now aging Dunlop SportMaxx RT2 led the way in both aquaplaning tests.
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Nokian PowerProof
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Syron Premium Performance
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Nokian PowerProof
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Syron Premium Performance
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
Environment
The external noise test bumped the budget "Berlin Tyres" to the top of the group.
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Nokian PowerProof
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Syron Premium Performance
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
The cheapest tyres in the group happened to have the lowest rolling resistance, which is a little unusual for such a test.
As usual, the Michelin was the most expensive tyre on test, over twice the price of the cheapest tyres.
- Berlin Tires Summer UHP 1
- Syron Premium Performance
- Barum Bravuris 5HM
- Maxxis Victra Sport 5
- Kleber Dynaxer UHP
- Nokian PowerProof
- Vredestein Ultrac Vorti
- Toyo Proxes Sport A
- Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3
- Dunlop SportMaxx RT 2
- Pirelli P Zero PZ4
- Continental Sport Contact 6
- Bridgestone Potenza Sport
- Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
- Michelin Pilot Sport 4 S
Results
Top performer with precise steering and dynamic handling, shortest wet braking distance, shortest dry braking, good comfort, low rolling resistance.
High Price.
Highly Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
33.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
118.4 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
45.5 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
74 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-3.2 Km/H |
95.85% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
73.6 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.74% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
11th |
2.34 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.45 m/sec2 |
83.87% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
72.3 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
15th |
720 |
340 |
+380 |
47.22% |
| Rolling Resistance |
8th |
8.87 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.96 kg / t |
89.18% |
New sports pattern with direct steering and balanced handling, excellent dry handling, short wet and dry braking distances.
Slightly higher noise.
Highly Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
34.7 M |
33.5 M |
+1.2 M |
96.54% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
119.7 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
48.8 M |
45.5 M |
+3.3 M |
93.24% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
73.9 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-3.3 Km/H |
95.73% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
74 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-1.3 Km/H |
98.27% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
2nd |
2.72 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.07 m/sec2 |
97.49% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
73.7 dB |
71.5 dB |
+2.2 dB |
97.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
12th |
630 |
340 |
+290 |
53.97% |
| Rolling Resistance |
13th |
9.57 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.66 kg / t |
82.65% |
Balanced sports tyre with secure handling characteristics and precise steering, short wet and dry braking distances, low noises.
Higher price level.
Highly Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
33.7 M |
33.5 M |
+0.2 M |
99.41% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
117.8 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
98.41% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
46.8 M |
45.5 M |
+1.3 M |
97.22% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
74.2 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
96.11% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
74.7 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
99.2% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
12th |
2.33 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.46 m/sec2 |
83.51% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
71.5 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
12th |
630 |
340 |
+290 |
53.97% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.43 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.52 kg / t |
93.83% |
Convincing handling qualities on wet and dry roads, high grip, precise steering behavior, short dry braking distances.
Higher rolling resistance.
Highly Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
34.5 M |
33.5 M |
+1 M |
97.1% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
118.8 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
48.6 M |
45.5 M |
+3.1 M |
93.62% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
77.2 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
71.6 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
95.09% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
8th |
2.43 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.36 m/sec2 |
87.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
72.5 dB |
71.5 dB |
+1 dB |
98.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
585 |
340 |
+245 |
58.12% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
9.9 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.99 kg / t |
79.9% |
Balanced sports tyre with safe handling qualities, precise steering response, good aquaplaning safety, short dry braking distances, well priced.
Slightly extended wet braking.
Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
34.9 M |
33.5 M |
+1.4 M |
95.99% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
117.2 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
97.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
51.2 M |
45.5 M |
+5.7 M |
88.87% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
72.4 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-4.8 Km/H |
93.78% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
73.1 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.08% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
6th |
2.52 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.27 m/sec2 |
90.32% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
3rd |
71.7 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.2 dB |
99.72% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
9th |
545 |
340 |
+205 |
62.39% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.8 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.89 kg / t |
89.89% |
A well balanced tyre with precise handling qualities on wet roads, stable cornering, short dry braking distances, good value for money.
High rolling resistance.
Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
35.3 M |
33.5 M |
+1.8 M |
94.9% |
| Dry Handling |
5th |
117.6 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-2.1 Km/H |
98.25% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
50.4 M |
45.5 M |
+4.9 M |
90.28% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
73.8 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
95.6% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
73.1 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.08% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
4th |
2.57 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.22 m/sec2 |
92.11% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
71.9 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.44% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
520 |
340 |
+180 |
65.38% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
9.9 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.99 kg / t |
79.9% |
Sports tyres with high performance potential, stable wet and dry handling, good aquaplaning safety, short dry braking distances.
Slightly longer wet braking distances.
Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
35.3 M |
33.5 M |
+1.8 M |
94.9% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
117 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-2.7 Km/H |
97.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
8th |
51.7 M |
45.5 M |
+6.2 M |
88.01% |
| Wet Handling |
8th |
72.7 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-4.5 Km/H |
94.17% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
75.3 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
1st |
2.79 m/sec2 |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
71.8 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
10th |
585 |
340 |
+245 |
58.12% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.71 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.8 kg / t |
90.82% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short wet and dry braking distances, good grip and balanced handling behavior in the wet.
Slight understeer balance in the dry.
Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
35.4 M |
33.5 M |
+1.9 M |
94.63% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
116.5 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-3.2 Km/H |
97.33% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
48.8 M |
45.5 M |
+3.3 M |
93.24% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
72.6 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-4.6 Km/H |
94.04% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
74.1 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.41% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
5th |
2.54 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.25 m/sec2 |
91.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
72 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.5 dB |
99.31% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
14th |
650 |
340 |
+310 |
52.31% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.96 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.05 kg / t |
88.28% |
Well priced with good aquaplaning resistance and safe handling, short dry braking distances, good comfort.
Extended wet braking distances.
Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
6th |
35 M |
33.5 M |
+1.5 M |
95.71% |
| Dry Handling |
7th |
117.1 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-2.6 Km/H |
97.83% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
54.2 M |
45.5 M |
+8.7 M |
83.95% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
72.9 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-4.3 Km/H |
94.43% |
| Straight Aqua |
3rd |
74.4 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.8% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
3rd |
2.62 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.17 m/sec2 |
93.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
72.4 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
4th |
440 |
340 |
+100 |
77.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
9.34 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.43 kg / t |
84.69% |
Short dry braking distances, low rolling resistance, well priced.
Only average wet performance, understeer in the dry.
Satisfactory.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
36.8 M |
33.5 M |
+3.3 M |
91.03% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
115.7 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
96.66% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
51.8 M |
45.5 M |
+6.3 M |
87.84% |
| Wet Handling |
12th |
69.9 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-7.3 Km/H |
90.54% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
69.9 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-5.4 Km/H |
92.83% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
14th |
2.15 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.64 m/sec2 |
77.06% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
5th |
71.9 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.44% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
490 |
340 |
+150 |
69.39% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
8.41 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.5 kg / t |
94.05% |
Dynamic precise wet handling, short dry braking distances, well priced.
Very long wet braking distances, understeer in the dry.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
36 M |
33.5 M |
+2.5 M |
93.06% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
116.7 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-3 Km/H |
97.49% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
57.3 M |
45.5 M |
+11.8 M |
79.41% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
73.1 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
94.69% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
72.2 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
95.88% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
7th |
2.5 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.29 m/sec2 |
89.61% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
8th |
72.3 dB |
71.5 dB |
+0.8 dB |
98.89% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
7th |
520 |
340 |
+180 |
65.38% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
9.48 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.57 kg / t |
83.44% |
Stable cornering in the wet,short dry braking distances, well priced.
Long wet braking distances, strong understeer in the wet and dry.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
35.6 M |
33.5 M |
+2.1 M |
94.1% |
| Dry Handling |
11th |
116 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
96.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
54.2 M |
45.5 M |
+8.7 M |
83.95% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
70.9 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-6.3 Km/H |
91.84% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
71.2 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-4.1 Km/H |
94.56% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
2.38 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.41 m/sec2 |
85.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
12th |
73.1 dB |
71.5 dB |
+1.6 dB |
97.81% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
5th |
490 |
340 |
+150 |
69.39% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
9.26 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+1.35 kg / t |
85.42% |
Low rolling resistance, low price.
Long wet and dry braking distances, limited lateral grip, spongy steering response.
Conditionally Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
14th |
37.2 M |
33.5 M |
+3.7 M |
90.05% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
114.3 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-5.4 Km/H |
95.49% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
56.4 M |
45.5 M |
+10.9 M |
80.67% |
| Wet Handling |
13th |
68.5 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-8.7 Km/H |
88.73% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
69.5 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-5.8 Km/H |
92.3% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
9th |
2.38 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.41 m/sec2 |
85.3% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
74.4 dB |
71.5 dB |
+2.9 dB |
96.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
3rd |
430 |
340 |
+90 |
79.07% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.44 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.53 kg / t |
93.72% |
Low price, low rolling resistance.
Low grip in the wet, high levels of understeer with spongy handling, loud noise.
Not Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
12th |
36.6 M |
33.5 M |
+3.1 M |
91.53% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
115.8 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
96.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
63.2 M |
45.5 M |
+17.7 M |
71.99% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
64.3 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-12.9 Km/H |
83.29% |
| Straight Aqua |
14th |
67.7 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-7.6 Km/H |
89.91% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
13th |
2.27 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.52 m/sec2 |
81.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
14th |
74 dB |
71.5 dB |
+2.5 dB |
96.62% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
2nd |
400 |
340 |
+60 |
85% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.91 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Low noise.
Critical driving characteristics, very long braking distance, poor aquaplaning resistance.
Not Recommended.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
39 M |
33.5 M |
+5.5 M |
85.9% |
| Dry Handling |
15th |
113.7 Km/H |
119.7 Km/H |
-6 Km/H |
94.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
14th |
62 M |
45.5 M |
+16.5 M |
73.39% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
66.6 Km/H |
77.2 Km/H |
-10.6 Km/H |
86.27% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
64.7 Km/H |
75.3 Km/H |
-10.6 Km/H |
85.92% |
| Curved Aquaplaning |
15th |
1.84 m/sec2 |
2.79 m/sec2 |
-0.95 m/sec2 |
65.95% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
71.5 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Price |
1st |
340 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
3rd |
8.42 kg / t |
7.91 kg / t |
+0.51 kg / t |
93.94% |
opinion on falken fk510 in this dimension? better than hankook?
I'd guess they'd be very close! FK520 is now out though
hi, i have a question about the tire. I watched last year’s tests and can’t decide which one to buy. I have dimension 235 / 35R19. I choose between hankook s1 evo3, ultrac vorti +. I drive calmly, sometimes dynamically, I drive 10-12k a year. I want a tire that is safe in the wet and good in the dry. I know that you are the best at this and your opinion would help me the most.
thank you very much
I would take the Hankook of those two.
thank you.
What was the test car? Gutted I haven't tried my new Bridgestones yet as I've not had my car for over 3 weeks :(
I believe it was the Seat Cupra R, basically a Golf GTI in a dress :)
My personal winner is the Pirelli PZ4. Looks like it´s very good in Handling.
Some surprises: The old Dunlop RT2 is at same level as the newer Goodyear F1 A5, strong result of the Ultrac Vorti.
The two worst tyres are from Keskin who say these tyres are engineered in Germany, but it´s manufactured for a cheap price somewhere else
The Pirelli seems to do very well in the wet handling tests and it is not shabby in the dry either. If they could sort the rolling resistance they would be up there with the best.
I wonder if the dual compound is limited to the OEM sport car variants.
I´m not sure whether rolling resistance and wet handling can be combined optimal. The best tyre in rolling resistance is the 14th place and have awful wet grip.
Looks like Conti came close to a good compromise, but the other good tyres in the wet handling, the PZ4 and the Potenza are far away in rolling resistance
My personal opinion: Wet handling is much more important than rolling resistance. I´ve drive for many years company cars with tyres like Michelin Energy Saver and Goodyear Efficientgrip Performance and would not buy it for my own car.
I think you are performing these weeks a test with a very similar group of tyres. It will be interesting to see if the results look like similar!
You are correct, and yes it will be :)