Test Publication:
Auto Bild
205/55 R16
16 tyres
5 categories
Test Size:
205/55 R16
Tyres Tested:
16 tyres
Auto Bild is not affiliated with, and does not endorse, Tyre Reviews. This is independent editorial coverage of their published test.
Following on from the 32 tyre braking shootout, Auto Bild have taken the fourteen best all season tyres to the full test, and included a summer and winter tyre as reference.
As with the Tyre Reviews all season test, Auto Bild have ranked the new Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-3 as the best all season tyre, not because it was outstanding in one single area, but because it had a rounded performance in nearly all tests.
Auto Bild also tested the new Vredestein Quatrac, which replaces the Quatrac 5. This new tyre performed excellently in the dry and wet tests, and had the best wear of the group, making the Vredestein Quatrac a very good tyre for climates like the UK.
Auto Bild also found the Continental AllSeasonContact to be a well rounded tyre, and the CrossClimate+ strong in the dry, but a little disappointing in the wet.
The updated Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO again struggled in the snow, which peanalised it more with the German score weighting than it did in the Tyre Reviews test.
Auto Bild performed drum wear testing and while their mileage predictions seem somewhat optimistic, it's worth scrolling down to the wear section to see the results as it wasn't something Tyre Reviews could test this year.
It's always nice when the data from two different tests, in difference sizes, performed in different conditions are similar, and this is what we have between the Auto Bild results, and our own.
Dry
As usual, the summer reference tyre had the advantage in dry braking, and the dry optimised Michelin CrossClimate+ was a close second.
- Reference Summer
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Reference Winter
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Dry Handling retained the summer tyre's advantage, with the Bridgestone WeatherControl A005 EVO moving up to second place, ahead of the Vredestein and Michelin.
- Reference Summer
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Reference Winter
Wet
As in the Tyre Reviews test, a number of all season tyres beat the summer tyre in wet braking, with Bridgestone taking the lead.
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Reference Summer
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Reference Winter
Wet handling moved the new Quatrac to the top, ahead of the Hankook and Goodyear.
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Reference Summer
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Reference Winter
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
Straight aquaplaning had the summer leading by a small margin over the Vredestein and Hankook.
- Reference Summer
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Reference Winter
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
Snow
There was a 5.3 meter spread between the best and worst all season tyres, with the summer tyre stopping significantly behind the group.
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Reference Winter
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Reference Summer
Kleber and BFGoodrich performed well in snow braking and snow handling, with Bridgestone and Pirelli the worst of the all season tyres in both tests.
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Reference Winter
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Reference Summer
Cost
The projected wear numbers seemed unusually high, with the new Vredestein reportedly being good for over 75,000kms!
While the numbers might be optimistic, we can focus on the overall order of the result to show us the new Vredestein and Goodyear beat the wear king Michelin, while the Bridgestone and Hankook struggle.
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
Calculating euros per 1000km gives us an overall cost for the tyres life, where the cheaper tyres can still be cost effective, even with lower projected wear.
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
Fuel use is another important factor for a tyre you will use year round, and in this test Bridgestone, Goodyear and Pirelli lead the way.
Noise
Unlike the Tyre Reviews test, Auto Bild tested external pass by noise, not internal noise.
- Kumho Solus 4S HA32
- BFGoodrich g Grip All Season 2
- Maxxis Premitra All Season AP3
- Kleber Quadraxer 2
- Nexen N Blue 4 Season
- Michelin CrossClimate Plus
- Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen 3
- Bridgestone Weather Control A005 E
- Pirelli Cinturato All Season SF
- Vredestein Quatrac
- Reference Summer
- Firestone MultiSeason Gen 02
- Continental AllSeasonContact
- Hankook Kinergy 4S2
- Falken EUROALL SEASON AS210
- Reference Winter
Results
Be sure to check out the Auto Bild website for the full data.
New all season tyre with convincing performance in all weather conditions. Dynamic snow, wet and dry handling, high mileage.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
9th |
41.6 M |
39 M |
+2.6 M |
93.75% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
90 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
3rd |
47 M |
45 M |
+2 M |
95.74% |
| Wet Handling |
3rd |
78.8 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-0.7 Km/H |
99.12% |
| Straight Aqua |
7th |
78.2 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-3.7 Km/H |
95.48% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
8th |
28.5 M |
26.6 M |
+1.9 M |
93.33% |
| Snow Handling |
4th |
42 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
98.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
70.7 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
2nd |
72680 KM |
75090 KM |
-2410 KM |
96.79% |
| Value |
4th |
4.27 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.28 Price/1000 |
93.44% |
| Price |
9th |
310 |
240 |
+70 |
77.42% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.93 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.2 kg / t |
97.48% |
New all season tyre with exemplary level of performance. Stable driving characteristics in the snow, best aquaplaning resistance, dynamic wet handling, short braking, very low wear.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
4th |
40.6 M |
39 M |
+1.6 M |
96.06% |
| Dry Handling |
3rd |
90.4 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.45% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
2nd |
46.3 M |
45 M |
+1.3 M |
97.19% |
| Wet Handling |
1st |
79.5 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
81.4 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
9th |
28.6 M |
26.6 M |
+2 M |
93.01% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
40.9 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
96.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
10th |
71.2 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.9 dB |
98.74% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
1st |
75090 KM |
|
|
100% |
| Value |
6th |
4.73 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.74 Price/1000 |
84.36% |
| Price |
13th |
355 |
240 |
+115 |
67.61% |
| Rolling Resistance |
11th |
8.88 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+1.15 kg / t |
87.05% |
Convincing all round performance with best winter qualities and very good price-performance ratio. Very good aquaplaning properties, precise steering, low wear, low rolling resistance.
None mentioned.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
12th |
43 M |
39 M |
+4 M |
90.7% |
| Dry Handling |
6th |
90 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
99.01% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
6th |
48.6 M |
45 M |
+3.6 M |
92.59% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
77.9 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.99% |
| Straight Aqua |
5th |
80.2 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
97.92% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
27.9 M |
26.6 M |
+1.3 M |
95.34% |
| Snow Handling |
5th |
41.9 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-0.6 Km/H |
98.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
13th |
71.4 dB |
70.3 dB |
+1.1 dB |
98.46% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
6th |
64890 KM |
75090 KM |
-10200 KM |
86.42% |
| Value |
9th |
5.24 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+1.25 Price/1000 |
76.15% |
| Price |
12th |
340 |
240 |
+100 |
70.59% |
| Rolling Resistance |
5th |
8.15 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.42 kg / t |
94.85% |
Premium all season tyres with balanced performance, dynamic handling qualities, precise steering, low wear, low rolling resistance.
Expensive.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
2nd |
39.7 M |
39 M |
+0.7 M |
98.24% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
90.1 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
9th |
49.7 M |
45 M |
+4.7 M |
90.54% |
| Wet Handling |
5th |
78.5 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.74% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
75.3 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-6.6 Km/H |
91.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
10th |
28.9 M |
26.6 M |
+2.3 M |
92.04% |
| Snow Handling |
7th |
40.9 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
96.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.6 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
3rd |
70210 KM |
75090 KM |
-4880 KM |
93.5% |
| Value |
10th |
5.34 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+1.35 Price/1000 |
74.72% |
| Price |
14th |
375 |
240 |
+135 |
64% |
| Rolling Resistance |
4th |
8.01 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.28 kg / t |
96.5% |
Balanced driving characteristics, stable behavior in all weather, good aquaplaning resistance, high mileage, low price.
Average snow braking.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
11th |
42.7 M |
39 M |
+3.7 M |
91.33% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
89.7 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.68% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
14th |
51.3 M |
45 M |
+6.3 M |
87.72% |
| Wet Handling |
10th |
77 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-2.5 Km/H |
96.86% |
| Straight Aqua |
8th |
78 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-3.9 Km/H |
95.24% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
13th |
30.3 M |
26.6 M |
+3.7 M |
87.79% |
| Snow Handling |
9th |
40.8 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.7 Km/H |
96% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
15th |
72.2 dB |
70.3 dB |
+1.9 dB |
97.37% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
4th |
67820 KM |
75090 KM |
-7270 KM |
90.32% |
| Value |
2nd |
4.05 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.06 Price/1000 |
98.52% |
| Price |
6th |
275 |
240 |
+35 |
87.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.96 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+1.23 kg / t |
86.27% |
Good traction and short braking distances in the snow, dynamic wet handling, short dry braking distances, low wear, very good price-performance ratio.
Average aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
8th |
41.2 M |
39 M |
+2.2 M |
94.66% |
| Dry Handling |
8th |
89.9 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-1 Km/H |
98.9% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
49.3 M |
45 M |
+4.3 M |
91.28% |
| Wet Handling |
7th |
77.9 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-1.6 Km/H |
97.99% |
| Straight Aqua |
16th |
74.6 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-7.3 Km/H |
91.09% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
4th |
27.6 M |
26.6 M |
+1 M |
96.38% |
| Snow Handling |
10th |
40.7 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.8 Km/H |
95.76% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
71.3 dB |
70.3 dB |
+1 dB |
98.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
5th |
67815 KM |
75090 KM |
-7275 KM |
90.31% |
| Value |
3rd |
4.06 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.07 Price/1000 |
98.28% |
| Price |
6th |
275 |
240 |
+35 |
87.27% |
| Rolling Resistance |
6th |
8.5 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.77 kg / t |
90.94% |
Convincing driving characteristics in the wet, good snow performance, short wet and dry braking, very good aquaplaning resistance.
Average wear, average comfort.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
7th |
41.1 M |
39 M |
+2.1 M |
94.89% |
| Dry Handling |
4th |
90.1 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.8 Km/H |
99.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
47.2 M |
45 M |
+2.2 M |
95.34% |
| Wet Handling |
2nd |
79.1 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-0.4 Km/H |
99.5% |
| Straight Aqua |
2nd |
81.4 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-0.5 Km/H |
99.39% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
6th |
27.9 M |
26.6 M |
+1.3 M |
95.34% |
| Snow Handling |
6th |
41.1 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.4 Km/H |
96.71% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
14th |
71.6 dB |
70.3 dB |
+1.3 dB |
98.18% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
13th |
44905 KM |
75090 KM |
-30185 KM |
59.8% |
| Value |
11th |
5.79 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+1.8 Price/1000 |
68.91% |
| Price |
3rd |
260 |
240 |
+20 |
92.31% |
| Rolling Resistance |
14th |
9.03 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+1.3 kg / t |
85.6% |
Winter professional with best driving performance on snow, short dry braking distances, low noise, good mileage, well priced.
Limited curved aquaplaning resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
14th |
43.2 M |
39 M |
+4.2 M |
90.28% |
| Dry Handling |
13th |
88.9 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-2 Km/H |
97.8% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
13th |
51.2 M |
45 M |
+6.2 M |
87.89% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
76.4 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
96.1% |
| Straight Aqua |
15th |
75.1 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-6.8 Km/H |
91.7% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
3rd |
27.2 M |
26.6 M |
+0.6 M |
97.79% |
| Snow Handling |
1st |
42.5 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.6 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
7th |
62750 KM |
75090 KM |
-12340 KM |
83.57% |
| Value |
5th |
4.3 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.31 Price/1000 |
92.79% |
| Price |
4th |
270 |
240 |
+30 |
88.89% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.55 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.82 kg / t |
90.41% |
Snow professional with excellent cornering and good traction, short dry braking, good comfort, low rolling resistance.
Understeer in the wet.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
13th |
43.1 M |
39 M |
+4.1 M |
90.49% |
| Dry Handling |
15th |
88.6 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
97.47% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
11th |
51 M |
45 M |
+6 M |
88.24% |
| Wet Handling |
14th |
76.1 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-3.4 Km/H |
95.72% |
| Straight Aqua |
13th |
75.3 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-6.6 Km/H |
91.94% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
1st |
26.6 M |
|
|
100% |
| Snow Handling |
2nd |
42.3 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-0.2 Km/H |
99.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
70.4 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.1 dB |
99.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
10th |
57235 KM |
75090 KM |
-17855 KM |
76.22% |
| Value |
12th |
5.85 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+1.86 Price/1000 |
68.21% |
| Price |
11th |
335 |
240 |
+95 |
71.64% |
| Rolling Resistance |
7th |
8.55 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.82 kg / t |
90.41% |
Sporty dynamic handling in the dry and wet, short dry and wet braking, best rolling resistance.
Poor wear, moderate snow performance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
40.9 M |
39 M |
+1.9 M |
95.35% |
| Dry Handling |
2nd |
90.6 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.67% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
1st |
45 M |
|
|
100% |
| Wet Handling |
6th |
78.3 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.49% |
| Straight Aqua |
12th |
75.8 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-6.1 Km/H |
92.55% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
14th |
30.9 M |
26.6 M |
+4.3 M |
86.08% |
| Snow Handling |
14th |
40.1 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
94.35% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
7th |
70.7 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.4 dB |
99.43% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
12th |
48575 KM |
75090 KM |
-26515 KM |
64.69% |
| Value |
14th |
6.59 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+2.6 Price/1000 |
60.55% |
| Price |
10th |
320 |
240 |
+80 |
75% |
| Rolling Resistance |
1st |
7.73 kg / t |
|
|
100% |
Balanced level of performance, short dry braking, good aquaplaning resistance, low noise, low price.
Average wet grip, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
10th |
41.9 M |
39 M |
+2.9 M |
93.08% |
| Dry Handling |
12th |
89 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
97.91% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
10th |
50.3 M |
45 M |
+5.3 M |
89.46% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
76.4 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
96.1% |
| Straight Aqua |
6th |
78.4 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-3.5 Km/H |
95.73% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
12th |
29.9 M |
26.6 M |
+3.3 M |
88.96% |
| Snow Handling |
13th |
40.2 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-2.3 Km/H |
94.59% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
4th |
70.6 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.3 dB |
99.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
8th |
60175 KM |
75090 KM |
-14915 KM |
80.14% |
| Value |
1st |
3.99 Price/1000 |
|
|
100% |
| Price |
1st |
240 |
|
|
100% |
| Rolling Resistance |
15th |
9.67 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+1.94 kg / t |
79.94% |
Good aquaplaning resistance, short dry braking distances, low wear, low rolling resistance.
Long braking distances and understeer in the snow.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
3rd |
39.8 M |
39 M |
+0.8 M |
97.99% |
| Dry Handling |
14th |
88.7 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
97.58% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
12th |
51.1 M |
45 M |
+6.1 M |
88.06% |
| Wet Handling |
11th |
76.4 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-3.1 Km/H |
96.1% |
| Straight Aqua |
9th |
77.9 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
95.12% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
15th |
31.9 M |
26.6 M |
+5.3 M |
83.39% |
| Snow Handling |
15th |
39.7 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-2.8 Km/H |
93.41% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
9th |
70.8 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.5 dB |
99.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
9th |
60150 KM |
75090 KM |
-14940 KM |
80.1% |
| Value |
7th |
4.9 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+0.91 Price/1000 |
81.43% |
| Price |
8th |
295 |
240 |
+55 |
81.36% |
| Rolling Resistance |
2nd |
7.93 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.2 kg / t |
97.48% |
Good driving characteristics for all weather, short braking distances in the snow, dynamic wet and dry handling.
High wear, high rolling resistance.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
44.3 M |
39 M |
+5.3 M |
88.04% |
| Dry Handling |
9th |
89.8 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-1.1 Km/H |
98.79% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
7th |
49.3 M |
45 M |
+4.3 M |
91.28% |
| Wet Handling |
9th |
77.1 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
96.98% |
| Straight Aqua |
11th |
76.2 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-5.7 Km/H |
93.04% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
5th |
27.7 M |
26.6 M |
+1.1 M |
96.03% |
| Snow Handling |
11th |
40.6 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-1.9 Km/H |
95.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
1st |
70.3 dB |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
14th |
43000 KM |
75090 KM |
-32090 KM |
57.26% |
| Value |
13th |
6.28 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+2.29 Price/1000 |
63.54% |
| Price |
4th |
270 |
240 |
+30 |
88.89% |
| Rolling Resistance |
16th |
9.99 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+2.26 kg / t |
77.38% |
Good safety reserves in aquaplaning, dynamic handling and short braking distances in the dry.
Moderate wear, understeer in the dry, long wet braking distances.
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
5th |
40.9 M |
39 M |
+1.9 M |
95.35% |
| Dry Handling |
10th |
89.7 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.68% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
15th |
53.4 M |
45 M |
+8.4 M |
84.27% |
| Wet Handling |
16th |
75.5 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-4 Km/H |
94.97% |
| Straight Aqua |
4th |
80.7 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-1.2 Km/H |
98.53% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
11th |
29.5 M |
26.6 M |
+2.9 M |
90.17% |
| Snow Handling |
12th |
40.3 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-2.2 Km/H |
94.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
2nd |
70.4 dB |
70.3 dB |
+0.1 dB |
99.86% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wear |
11th |
50030 KM |
75090 KM |
-25060 KM |
66.63% |
| Value |
8th |
5.1 Price/1000 |
3.99 Price/1000 |
+1.11 Price/1000 |
78.24% |
| Price |
2nd |
255 |
240 |
+15 |
94.12% |
| Rolling Resistance |
12th |
8.96 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+1.23 kg / t |
86.27% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
1st |
39 M |
|
|
100% |
| Dry Handling |
1st |
90.9 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
4th |
47.2 M |
45 M |
+2.2 M |
95.34% |
| Wet Handling |
4th |
78.6 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-0.9 Km/H |
98.87% |
| Straight Aqua |
1st |
81.9 Km/H |
|
|
100% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
16th |
68.8 M |
26.6 M |
+42.2 M |
38.66% |
| Snow Handling |
16th |
26.7 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-15.8 Km/H |
62.82% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
11th |
71.3 dB |
70.3 dB |
+1 dB |
98.6% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
9th |
8.59 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.86 kg / t |
89.99% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Dry Braking |
15th |
44.3 M |
39 M |
+5.3 M |
88.04% |
| Dry Handling |
16th |
88.5 Km/H |
90.9 Km/H |
-2.4 Km/H |
97.36% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Wet Braking |
16th |
55.8 M |
45 M |
+10.8 M |
80.65% |
| Wet Handling |
15th |
75.7 Km/H |
79.5 Km/H |
-3.8 Km/H |
95.22% |
| Straight Aqua |
10th |
76.7 Km/H |
81.9 Km/H |
-5.2 Km/H |
93.65% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Snow Braking |
2nd |
27 M |
26.6 M |
+0.4 M |
98.52% |
| Snow Handling |
3rd |
42.2 Km/H |
42.5 Km/H |
-0.3 Km/H |
99.29% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Noise |
16th |
72.4 dB |
70.3 dB |
+2.1 dB |
97.1% |
| Test |
# |
Result |
Best |
Diff |
% |
| Rolling Resistance |
10th |
8.6 kg / t |
7.73 kg / t |
+0.87 kg / t |
89.88% |
Hi. There is much of unlogic stuff. Kimbo Solus H32. 2020. Worst on test in wear, 2021.first on test in wear. Same tyre...
Tyre companies love putting out big updates into existing tyres and not changing the name. I'm not sure of the logic, but it could be that
Hi TyreReviews
Thanks for great and detailed review, however I am uncertain as to which exact tyres were tested. Example - following your review I would like to buy Goodyear Vector, but in the tested size (205/55/16) they come in a few different versions. Even if I stick to my load/fuel index (which is 91 V) Goodyear still has 3 versions of that tyre - one regular and two XLs. And the difference between them can be seen in noise levels, fuel consumption etc.
Two of them have C for fuel consumption (EU label) and one of them has A respectively.
So which variation of this tyre exactly is meant in the test?
There is quite a difference between A and C fuel indexes so which tyre was better in this respect than Continental AllSeason which is widely considered to have low rolling resistance. But here again, Continental comes in regular and XL variants with C and B fuel indexes - so which Continental do you mean?
I would gladly follow your advice and choose Goodyear but should I go for XL Goodyear tyres? My car allegedly does not need them (Toyota Corolla Verso 1.6 110HP R1 - 2004) but maybe I would benefit from using them? Only XL version has A class fuel consumption.
Could you please clarify this topic a bit and specify which tyre versions were used in these tests?
Thank you a lot.
Hi Alexandra, this wasn't my test, it was conducted by Auto Bild, they should have the full details on their German website. You can read the tyre reviews all season test here which has the load / speed / DOT noted in the results:
https://www.tyrereviews.com...
OK - but Auto Bild says that they had tested Goodyear V4season with 91V index and C petrol class, and that petrolwise it was almost the best (2nd place). They claim it was even better than Continental - the only tyre with B petrol class in the test. So how can Goodyear be better in this respect?? Are EU labels unreliable or was Auto Bild test faulty? I would really appreciate your opinion on that.
Different test conditions can change the order, it's not unusual to see magazines having different RR results from the official label scores, in fact it's quite common!
I am planning to purchase Nokian Seasonproof tyres for my Skoda Fabia estate for use in the UK. Any recent user comments, please?
Traditionally the Nokian all season tyres are the most winter bias, so unless you're in the very North of the UK I would suggest something a bit more suited to our climate
Thanks; I am in the Midlands of England with little snow most winters.
Hey, is this the Vredestein Quatrac 5 or the Pro version?
Neither, it's the new Quatrac
Can you please post a link of it? I cannot find it and here the thread is not shown as well.
It's literally linked in the article https://www.tyrereviews.com...
Is it possible that premium class Bridgestone is worst then middle class Firestone? It's not make any sense cos firestone belongs to bridgestone.
I would be surprised if that was the case with same generation tyres
Thanks for quick reply :-). Bridgestone Weather Control A005 EVO should be better because is premium grade. Firestone is middle class. Why Bridgestone make better tire from Firestone Company?
It doesn't make sense to have two brands at the same level, so they split tier them
It is obvious, I don't understand why cheaper lower class tires (Firestone Multiseason 2) are better than premium tires (Bridgestone Weather Control A005 Evo)?
The score weighting in this test favours snow grip, which the firestone did well in and the Bridgestone did not. The Bridgestone was way better in the dry and wet.
In your opinion as an expert which tire is better? I have a toyota avensis T27 1.8 valvematic. Mainly city driving. Which one would you choose?
This test highlights the differences. One is better in dry and wet and the other in snow, so it depends what you want
Should I be influenced by the fact that one is premium class and the other is middle class, is it a negligible argument
Negligible, not technical argument.
https://www.tirerack.com/ti...
I just found CC² on U.S. web. Looks they improve behavior on snow, but I expected more different pattern. Michelin wants sell out stores in Europe with old specs. probably, or myabe delay duo to EU ecoterorism.
The US version of the CC2 is a slightly different spec to the European version, I'll have more details in Feb :)
And, do you have more info now, about the European Michelin CrossClimate 2 version?
Sadly the planned test has been delayed, but I do know the main improvements of the CC2 are wet and snow performance. It was always dominating in the dry so it should be a really impressive tyre
Any further info on the CC2 / it's launch in Europe?
Sept 2nd :)
Mr Benson, you’ve outdone yourself yet again. Thank you.
One big suprise in this test, Vredestein made directional pattern....finally :-D
Here is another winter+AS tire test in 205/55/16. Even it's in Slovak language, graph and table are easily understandable. My front Hankooks quit burn out in Slovakian test.
https://www.youtube.com/wat...
The Quatrac 5 was direction, which this replaces :)
I've seen the video, interesting test, though I feel it's a shame there isn't two seperate videos forAS and winter.
It's probably due to, they had GY Utra Grip 9+ as a referential tire, and all winter and AS tires were compered to GY UG 9+.
This new Vredestein look like my next AS tires, because Bridgestone, even on EVO version, did'n improve snow performance and aquaplaning to my acceptable values.